§ The result
Cezanne Recruitment leads Arena Analytics by 9 points.
Cezanne Recruitment scores 41 and Arena Analytics 32 under rubric v1.0, a 9-point gap across the ATS-integrated and Screening cohorts. Cezanne Recruitment leads 6 of the 7 criteria, including Human Oversight Design, while Arena Analytics leads 1, including Bias Audit Transparency. The advantage Cezanne Recruitment holds is spread out: Human Oversight Design is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (Arena Analytics 38, Cezanne Recruitment 58, 12% weight), yet it supplies only 24% of the weighted points Cezanne Recruitment gains across the 6 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
Arena Analytics
Arena scores job applicants, mainly for healthcare and senior-living employers, on how likely they are to show up and stay in a specific role at a specific location, reroutes and sources candidates it rates likely to be retained, and applies the same outcome models to employee flight risk and internal mobility.
Vendor profile
Cezanne Recruitment
Cezanne Recruitment (formerly Occupop) is an applicant tracking system for SMEs that handles job posting, candidate management and interview scheduling. In its Recruitment PLUS+ tier it uses AI to score each CV from 0 to 100 against the job description, alongside weighted screening-question scores, knockout filters and optional AI anonymisation of CVs for hiring-manager review.
§ The record
Arena Analytics is filed under Screening AI, Cezanne Recruitment under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773. Only Arena Analytics is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Arena Analytics | Cezanne Recruitment |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | GB |
| Founded | 2015 | 2012 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
12% weight · 23% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Arena Analytics 38 · Cezanne Recruitment 58
2.4 weighted points to Cezanne Recruitment
20% weight · 43% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Arena Analytics 30 · Cezanne Recruitment 40
2.0 weighted points to Cezanne Recruitment
12% weight · 62% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Arena Analytics 28 · Cezanne Recruitment 44
1.9 weighted points to Cezanne Recruitment
15% weight · 79% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Arena Analytics 42 · Cezanne Recruitment 54
1.8 weighted points to Cezanne Recruitment
8% weight · 94% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Arena Analytics 38 · Cezanne Recruitment 57
1.5 weighted points to Cezanne Recruitment
15% weight · 98% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Arena Analytics 25 · Cezanne Recruitment 28
0.4 weighted points to Cezanne Recruitment
18% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Arena Analytics 25 · Cezanne Recruitment 24
0.2 weighted points to Arena Analytics
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -9.9 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 10.3 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -9 beside that -9.9.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Arena Analytics minus Cezanne Recruitment.
| Category | Weight | Arena Analytics | Cezanne Recruitment | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 30 | 40 | -10 | -2.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 25 | 24 | +1 | +0.2 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 28 | -3 | -0.4 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 42 | 54 | -12 | -1.8 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 38 | 58 | -20 | -2.4 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 28 | 44 | -16 | -1.9 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 38 | 57 | -19 | -1.5 |
| Total | 100% | 32 (F) | 41 (F) | -9 | -9.9 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Arena Analytics | Cezanne Recruitment | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 1 | — | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 23 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 25 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Arena Analytics has 30 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 23 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Cezanne Recruitment has 31 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 25 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Arena Analytics sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 61 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 30 for Arena Analytics, across 3 distinct source domains, and 31 for Cezanne Recruitment, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Arena Analytics last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Cezanne Recruitment last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.