HomeCompareArena Analytics vs Jobylon

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Arena Analytics vs Jobylon

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

Jobylon leads Arena Analytics on all 7 criteria.

Jobylon finishes 16 points clear of Arena Analytics under rubric v1.0 — 48 against 32 — across the ATS-integrated and Screening cohorts. Jobylon leads every one of the 7 criteria and 3 of them by 20 raw points or more, Article 11 Technical Documentation among them; Arena Analytics leads none. Even Article 11 Technical Documentation, the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (Arena Analytics 30, Jobylon 55, 20% weight), is only 31% of the weighted advantage Jobylon builds across the 7 criteria it leads.

§ The record

Arena Analytics is filed under Screening AI, Jobylon under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Sourcing.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773. Only Arena Analytics is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.

RecordArena AnalyticsJobylon
Price tierEnterpriseMid
HeadquartersUSSE
Founded20152011

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 20% weight · 31% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Arena Analytics 30 · Jobylon 55

    5.0 weighted points to Jobylon

  2. 12% weight · 48% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Arena Analytics 38 · Jobylon 60

    2.6 weighted points to Jobylon

  3. 15% weight · 63% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Arena Analytics 42 · Jobylon 58

    2.4 weighted points to Jobylon

  4. 12% weight · 75% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Arena Analytics 28 · Jobylon 45

    2.0 weighted points to Jobylon

  5. 8% weight · 86% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Arena Analytics 38 · Jobylon 60

    1.8 weighted points to Jobylon

  6. 15% weight · 97% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Arena Analytics 25 · Jobylon 36

    1.6 weighted points to Jobylon

  7. 18% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Arena Analytics 25 · Jobylon 28

    0.5 weighted points to Jobylon

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -16.0 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 16.0 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -16 beside that -16.0.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Arena Analytics minus Jobylon.

CategoryWeightArena AnalyticsJobylonΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%3055-25-5.0
Bias Audit Transparency18%2528-3-0.5
FRIA Support15%2536-11-1.6
Data Governance Disclosure15%4258-16-2.4
Human Oversight Design12%3860-22-2.6
Post-Market Monitoring12%2845-17-2.0
Customer Documentation8%3860-22-1.8
Total100%32 (F)48 (F)-16-16.0

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightArena AnalyticsJobylon
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%31Sources on a separate domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%21—31Sources on the vendor's own domain
FRIA Support15%11Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%61Sources on the vendor's own domain50Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%61Sources on the vendor's own domain50Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%21Sources on the vendor's own domain41Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%31Sources on the vendor's own domain51Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%237Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain285Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain

Arena Analytics has 30 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 23 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Jobylon has 33 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 28 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Arena Analytics sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 63 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 30 for Arena Analytics, across 3 distinct source domains, and 33 for Jobylon, across 1 distinct source domain.

Rubric
v1.0
Arena Analytics last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Jobylon last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.