HomeCompareArena Analytics vs Recruitly

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Arena Analytics vs Recruitly

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

Recruitly leads Arena Analytics by 9 points.

Recruitly scores 41 and Arena Analytics 32 under rubric v1.0, a 9-point gap across the ATS-integrated and Screening cohorts. Arena Analytics takes 1 of the 7 criteria, Bias Audit Transparency among them, against 6 for Recruitly, whose share includes Article 11 Technical Documentation. Human Oversight Design is the widest raw gap (Arena Analytics 38, Recruitly 60) but not the heaviest weighted swing, which is Article 11 Technical Documentation at 20% (Arena Analytics 30, Recruitly 45), 27% of the weighted advantage Recruitly builds across the 6 criteria it leads.

§ The record

Arena Analytics is filed under Screening AI, Recruitly under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Sourcing.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773. Only Arena Analytics is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.

RecordArena AnalyticsRecruitly
Price tierEnterpriseLow
HeadquartersUSAE
Founded20152015

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 20% weight · 23% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Arena Analytics 30 · Recruitly 45

    3.0 weighted points to Recruitly

  2. 12% weight · 43% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Arena Analytics 38 · Recruitly 60

    2.6 weighted points to Recruitly

  3. 12% weight · 59% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Arena Analytics 28 · Recruitly 45

    2.0 weighted points to Recruitly

  4. 18% weight · 73% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Arena Analytics 25 · Recruitly 15

    1.8 weighted points to Arena Analytics

  5. 8% weight · 85% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Arena Analytics 38 · Recruitly 58

    1.6 weighted points to Recruitly

  6. 15% weight · 97% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Arena Analytics 25 · Recruitly 35

    1.5 weighted points to Recruitly

  7. 15% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Arena Analytics 42 · Recruitly 45

    0.4 weighted points to Recruitly

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -9.4 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 13.0 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -9 beside that -9.4.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Arena Analytics minus Recruitly.

CategoryWeightArena AnalyticsRecruitlyΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%3045-15-3.0
Bias Audit Transparency18%2515+10+1.8
FRIA Support15%2535-10-1.5
Data Governance Disclosure15%4245-3-0.4
Human Oversight Design12%3860-22-2.6
Post-Market Monitoring12%2845-17-2.0
Customer Documentation8%3858-20-1.6
Total100%32 (F)41 (F)-9-9.4

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightArena AnalyticsRecruitly
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%31Sources on a separate domain51Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%21—31Sources on the vendor's own domain
FRIA Support15%11Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%61Sources on the vendor's own domain41Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%61Sources on the vendor's own domain70Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%21Sources on the vendor's own domain60Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%31Sources on the vendor's own domain41Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%237Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain325Sources on the vendor's own domain

Arena Analytics has 30 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 23 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Recruitly has 37 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 32 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Arena Analytics sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 67 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 30 for Arena Analytics, across 3 distinct source domains, and 37 for Recruitly, across 3 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Arena Analytics last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Recruitly last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.