Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Ashby vs Jobvite
Ashby
Ashby is an all-in-one recruiting platform combining applicant tracking, CRM/sourcing, scheduling, and analytics, with embedded AI features including resume-to-criteria evaluation, AI-assisted application review, sourcing outreach, and scheduling agents.
Substantial gaps
ATS-integrated
Jobvite
Jobvite is an enterprise applicant tracking and talent acquisition suite (part of Employ Inc.) that uses AI for candidate matching, intelligent messaging, and screening, with explanations of why candidates fit a role.
Substantial gaps
ATS-integrated
The result
Ashby leads Jobvite on all 7 criteria.
Both filed under ATS-integrated, Ashby and Jobvite come out 56 and 45 under rubric v1.0, 11 points in favour of Ashby. Ashby takes all 7 criteria and Jobvite none of them; the nearest contest is Data Governance Disclosure, Ashby 58 to Jobvite 55. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Ashby 62, Jobvite 38 — and at an 18% weight it carries 40% of the weighted advantage Ashby holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- Ashby7
- Jobvite0
- Widest raw gap
- Bias Audit Transparency62 vs 38
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Bias Audit Transparency18% weight
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
Ashby and Jobvite are both filed under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 2 secondary categories: Sourcing and Screening.
Both are in scope of
| Record | Ashby | Jobvite |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2018 | 2006 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight40% of the movement so far
Ashby62Jobvite384.3 weighted points to Ashby
- 2
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight64% of the movement so far
Ashby63Jobvite502.6 weighted points to Ashby
- 3
FRIA Support
15% weight80% of the movement so far
Ashby42Jobvite301.8 weighted points to Ashby
- 4
Human Oversight Design
12% weight88% of the movement so far
Ashby62Jobvite550.8 weighted points to Ashby
- 5
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight92% of the movement so far
Ashby42Jobvite380.5 weighted points to Ashby
- 6
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight96% of the movement so far
Ashby58Jobvite550.4 weighted points to Ashby
- 7
Customer Documentation
8% weight100% of the movement so far
Ashby63Jobvite580.4 weighted points to Ashby
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +10.9 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 10.9 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +11 beside that +10.9.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Ashby minus Jobvite, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | Ashby | Jobvite | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 63 | 50 | +13 | +2.6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 62 | 38 | +24 | +4.3 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 42 | 30 | +12 | +1.8 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 58 | 55 | +3 | +0.4 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 62 | 55 | +7 | +0.8 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 42 | 38 | +4 | +0.5 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 63 | 58 | +5 | +0.4 |
| Total | 100% | 56F | 45F | +11 | +10.9 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Ashby | Jobvite | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 2 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | — |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 16 | 6 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 15 | 5 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Ashby has 22 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 16 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Jobvite has 19 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 15 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Jobvite sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 41 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 22 for Ashby, across 1 distinct source domain, and 19 for Jobvite, across 3 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Ashby last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Jobvite last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
Where next
Scored against