HomeCompareBambooHR vs Tengai

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

BambooHR vs Tengai

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

1 point separates BambooHR and Tengai.

BambooHR holds a 1-point edge over Tengai under rubric v1.0, 43 to 42, across the ATS-integrated and Screening cohorts. The 7 criteria split 4 to 3 in favour of BambooHR: BambooHR is ahead on Post-Market Monitoring and Tengai on Human Oversight Design. Even Post-Market Monitoring, the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (BambooHR 44, Tengai 33, 12% weight), is only 36% of the weighted advantage BambooHR builds across the 4 criteria it leads.

§ The record

BambooHR is filed under ATS-integrated AI, Tengai under Screening AI. They record no secondary category in common.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Colorado AI Act. Only Tengai is in scope of Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.

RecordBambooHRTengai
Price tierMidMid
HeadquartersUSSE
Founded20082019

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 12% weight · 21% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    BambooHR 44 · Tengai 33

    1.3 weighted points to BambooHR

  2. 12% weight · 37% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    BambooHR 50 · Tengai 58

    1.0 weighted points to Tengai

  3. 18% weight · 52% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    BambooHR 28 · Tengai 33

    0.9 weighted points to Tengai

  4. 15% weight · 66% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    BambooHR 34 · Tengai 28

    0.9 weighted points to BambooHR

  5. 15% weight · 81% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    BambooHR 56 · Tengai 50

    0.9 weighted points to BambooHR

  6. 20% weight · 91% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    BambooHR 42 · Tengai 45

    0.6 weighted points to Tengai

  7. 8% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    BambooHR 62 · Tengai 55

    0.6 weighted points to BambooHR

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +1.2 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 6.1 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +1 beside that +1.2.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is BambooHR minus Tengai.

CategoryWeightBambooHRTengaiΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%4245-3-0.6
Bias Audit Transparency18%2833-5-0.9
FRIA Support15%3428+6+0.9
Data Governance Disclosure15%5650+6+0.9
Human Oversight Design12%5058-8-1.0
Post-Market Monitoring12%4433+11+1.3
Customer Documentation8%6255+7+0.6
Total100%43 (F)42 (F)+1+1.2

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightBambooHRTengai
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%21Sources on the vendor's own domain71Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%21Sources on the vendor's own domain51Sources on the vendor's own domain
FRIA Support15%11Sources on the vendor's own domain41Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%30Sources on the vendor's own domain60Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Human Oversight Design12%21Sources on the vendor's own domain60Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%21Sources on the vendor's own domain41Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%31Sources on the vendor's own domain51Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%156Sources on the vendor's own domain375Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

BambooHR has 21 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 15 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Tengai has 42 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 37 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Tengai sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 63 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 21 for BambooHR, across 1 distinct source domain, and 42 for Tengai, across 4 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
BambooHR last reviewed
July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Tengai last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.