§ The result
Greenhouse leads Brazen on all 7 criteria.
Rubric v1.0 puts 29 points between Greenhouse (ATS-integrated) and Brazen (Screening): 67 (D) for Greenhouse, 38 (F) for Brazen. Greenhouse leads every one of the 7 criteria and 4 of them by 20 raw points or more, Bias Audit Transparency among them; Brazen leads none. Bias Audit Transparency is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (Brazen 30, Greenhouse 86, 18% weight), but it accounts for only 35% of the weighted advantage Greenhouse holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Brazen
Brazen is a recruiting events platform (acquired by Radancy in 2023) that runs virtual and in-person hiring events with a recruiting chatbot, configurable knockout pre-screening, resume filtering, built-in candidate rankings/recommendations, and 1:1 text, audio, and video chats.
Vendor profile
Greenhouse
End-to-end applicant tracking system and structured-hiring platform, now layered with 'Greenhouse AI' features such as resume parsing, Talent Matching, and interview summarisation.
§ The record
Brazen is filed under Screening AI, Greenhouse under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773 and Colorado AI Act. Only Brazen is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Brazen | Greenhouse |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2007 | 2012 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 35% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Brazen 30 · Greenhouse 86
10.1 weighted points to Greenhouse
20% weight · 62% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Brazen 40 · Greenhouse 78
7.6 weighted points to Greenhouse
15% weight · 72% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Brazen 45 · Greenhouse 64
2.9 weighted points to Greenhouse
15% weight · 81% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Brazen 25 · Greenhouse 42
2.5 weighted points to Greenhouse
12% weight · 89% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Brazen 46 · Greenhouse 66
2.4 weighted points to Greenhouse
12% weight · 97% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Brazen 38 · Greenhouse 58
2.4 weighted points to Greenhouse
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Brazen 55 · Greenhouse 64
0.7 weighted points to Greenhouse
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -28.6 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 28.6 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -29 beside that -28.6.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Brazen minus Greenhouse.
| Category | Weight | Brazen | Greenhouse | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 40 | 78 | -38 | -7.6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 30 | 86 | -56 | -10.1 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 42 | -17 | -2.5 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 45 | 64 | -19 | -2.9 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 46 | 66 | -20 | -2.4 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 38 | 58 | -20 | -2.4 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 55 | 64 | -9 | -0.7 |
| Total | 100% | 38 (F) | 67 (D) | -29 | -28.6 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Brazen | Greenhouse | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 1 | — | 2 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 0 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 0 | 1 | — | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 6 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 16 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Brazen has 13 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 6 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Greenhouse has 17 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 16 with a source URL, 1 documented absence; some documentation or audit rows for Greenhouse sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 30 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 13 for Brazen, across 1 distinct source domain, and 17 for Greenhouse, across 3 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Brazen last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Greenhouse last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next