HomeCompareBrazen vs Pillar

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Brazen vs Pillar

Export comparison (CSV)Pro

§ The result

2 points separate Pillar and Brazen.

Within the Screening cohort, Pillar edges Brazen by 2 points under rubric v1.0, 40 to 38. Pillar leads 4 of the 7 criteria, including Bias Audit Transparency, while Brazen leads 2, including Post-Market Monitoring, and 1 is level. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Brazen 30, Pillar 38 — and at an 18% weight it carries 51% of the weighted advantage Pillar holds across the 4 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

Brazen and Pillar are both filed under Screening AI. They record no secondary category in common.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, Colorado AI Act and Mobley v. Workday.

RecordBrazenPillar
Price tierEnterpriseMid
HeadquartersUSUS
Founded20072019

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 38% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Brazen 30 · Pillar 38

    1.4 weighted points to Pillar

  2. 15% weight · 57% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Brazen 25 · Pillar 30

    0.8 weighted points to Pillar

  3. 12% weight · 73% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Brazen 38 · Pillar 33

    0.6 weighted points to Brazen

  4. 20% weight · 83% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Brazen 40 · Pillar 42

    0.4 weighted points to Pillar

  5. 8% weight · 94% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Brazen 55 · Pillar 50

    0.4 weighted points to Brazen

  6. 12% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Brazen 46 · Pillar 48

    0.2 weighted points to Pillar

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to -1.8 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 3.8 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -2 beside that -1.8.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Brazen minus Pillar.

CategoryWeightBrazenPillarΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%4042-2-0.4
Bias Audit Transparency18%3038-8-1.4
FRIA Support15%2530-5-0.8
Data Governance Disclosure15%4545--
Human Oversight Design12%4648-2-0.2
Post-Market Monitoring12%3833+5+0.6
Customer Documentation8%5550+5+0.4
Total100%38 (F)40 (F)-2-1.8

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightBrazenPillar
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%11Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%1121Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
FRIA Support15%0111Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%11Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%21Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%11Sources on the vendor's own domain11
Customer Documentation8%0121Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%67Sources on the vendor's own domain127Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain

Brazen has 13 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 6 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Pillar has 19 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 12 with a source URL, 7 documented absences.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 32 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 13 for Brazen, across 1 distinct source domain, and 19 for Pillar, across 1 distinct source domain.

Rubric
v1.0
Brazen last reviewed
July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Pillar last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.