HomeCompareBrazen vs UKG

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Brazen vs UKG

Export comparison (CSV)Pro

§ The result

UKG leads Brazen on 4 of the 7 criteria.

UKG scores 44 and Brazen 38 under rubric v1.0, a 6-point gap across the ATS-integrated and Screening cohorts. UKG leads 4 of the 7 criteria and the remaining 3 are level, so Brazen is ahead on none of them; the closest of the 4 UKG leads is Human Oversight Design, Brazen 46 to UKG 52. Data Governance Disclosure is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (Brazen 45, UKG 56, 15% weight), but it accounts for only 30% of the weighted advantage UKG holds across the 4 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

Brazen is filed under Screening AI, UKG under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773 and Colorado AI Act. Only Brazen is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.

RecordBrazenUKG
Price tierEnterpriseEnterprise
HeadquartersUSUS
Founded20072020

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 15% weight · 30% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Brazen 45 · UKG 56

    1.6 weighted points to UKG

  2. 20% weight · 59% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Brazen 40 · UKG 48

    1.6 weighted points to UKG

  3. 15% weight · 87% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Brazen 25 · UKG 35

    1.5 weighted points to UKG

  4. 12% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Brazen 46 · UKG 52

    0.7 weighted points to UKG

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 4 figures above sum to -5.5 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 5.5 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -6 beside that -5.5.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Brazen minus UKG.

CategoryWeightBrazenUKGΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%4048-8-1.6
Bias Audit Transparency18%3030--
FRIA Support15%2535-10-1.5
Data Governance Disclosure15%4556-11-1.6
Human Oversight Design12%4652-6-0.7
Post-Market Monitoring12%3838--
Customer Documentation8%5555--
Total100%38 (F)44 (F)-6-5.5

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightBrazenUKG
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%11Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%1102
FRIA Support15%0111Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%11Sources on the vendor's own domain20Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%21Sources on the vendor's own domain02
Post-Market Monitoring12%11Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%0111Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%67Sources on the vendor's own domain68Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain

Brazen has 13 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 6 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; UKG has 14 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 6 with a source URL, 8 documented absences.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 27 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 13 for Brazen, across 1 distinct source domain, and 14 for UKG, across 2 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Brazen last reviewed
July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
UKG last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.