HomeCompareBrightHire vs Cezanne Recruitment

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

BrightHire vs Cezanne Recruitment

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

BrightHire leads Cezanne Recruitment by 10 points.

BrightHire sits 10 points above Cezanne Recruitment under rubric v1.0 — 51 against 41 — with BrightHire filed under Screening and Cezanne Recruitment under ATS-integrated. Cezanne Recruitment takes 1 of the 7 criteria, Post-Market Monitoring among them, against 6 for BrightHire, whose share includes Bias Audit Transparency. One criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, is both the widest raw gap (BrightHire 50, Cezanne Recruitment 24) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 18% weight it makes up 48% of the weighted advantage BrightHire holds across the 6 criteria it leads.

§ The record

BrightHire is filed under Screening AI, Cezanne Recruitment under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773 and Colorado AI Act. Only BrightHire is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.

RecordBrightHireCezanne Recruitment
Price tierHighMid
HeadquartersUSGB
Founded20192012

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 47% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    BrightHire 50 · Cezanne Recruitment 24

    4.7 weighted points to BrightHire

  2. 20% weight · 70% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    BrightHire 52 · Cezanne Recruitment 40

    2.4 weighted points to BrightHire

  3. 15% weight · 82% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    BrightHire 36 · Cezanne Recruitment 28

    1.2 weighted points to BrightHire

  4. 15% weight · 91% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    BrightHire 60 · Cezanne Recruitment 54

    0.9 weighted points to BrightHire

  5. 8% weight · 95% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    BrightHire 62 · Cezanne Recruitment 57

    0.4 weighted points to BrightHire

  6. 12% weight · 98% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    BrightHire 60 · Cezanne Recruitment 58

    0.2 weighted points to BrightHire

  7. 12% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    BrightHire 42 · Cezanne Recruitment 44

    0.2 weighted points to Cezanne Recruitment

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +9.6 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 10.1 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +10 beside that +9.6.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is BrightHire minus Cezanne Recruitment.

CategoryWeightBrightHireCezanne RecruitmentΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%5240+12+2.4
Bias Audit Transparency18%5024+26+4.7
FRIA Support15%3628+8+1.2
Data Governance Disclosure15%6054+6+0.9
Human Oversight Design12%6058+2+0.2
Post-Market Monitoring12%4244-2-0.2
Customer Documentation8%6257+5+0.4
Total100%51 (F)41 (F)+10+9.6

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightBrightHireCezanne Recruitment
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%21Sources on the vendor's own domain41Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%21Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
FRIA Support15%21Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%31Sources on the vendor's own domain41Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%31Sources on the vendor's own domain50Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%21Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%21Sources on the vendor's own domain41Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%167Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain256Sources on the vendor's own domain

BrightHire has 23 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 16 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Cezanne Recruitment has 31 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 25 with a source URL, 6 documented absences.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 54 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 23 for BrightHire, across 2 distinct source domains, and 31 for Cezanne Recruitment, across 1 distinct source domain.

Rubric
v1.0
BrightHire last reviewed
August 2, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Cezanne Recruitment last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.