§ The result
Dayforce leads Cezanne Recruitment on all 7 criteria.
Under rubric v1.0, Dayforce opens a 16-point lead on Cezanne Recruitment, 57 to 41, with both scored in the ATS-integrated cohort. Dayforce takes all 7 criteria and Cezanne Recruitment none of them; the nearest contest is Post-Market Monitoring, Cezanne Recruitment 44 to Dayforce 47. Article 11 Technical Documentation is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Cezanne Recruitment 40, Dayforce 74 — and at a 20% weight it carries 43% of the weighted advantage Dayforce holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Cezanne Recruitment
Cezanne Recruitment (formerly Occupop) is an applicant tracking system for SMEs that handles job posting, candidate management and interview scheduling. In its Recruitment PLUS+ tier it uses AI to score each CV from 0 to 100 against the job description, alongside weighted screening-question scores, knockout filters and optional AI anonymisation of CVs for hiring-manager review.
Vendor profile
Dayforce
Dayforce is an enterprise human capital management platform whose Dayforce Recruiting module uses AI to assign letter grades to external job applicants, generate job descriptions, and automate screening and hiring workflows alongside HR, payroll, time, talent, and analytics.
§ The record
Cezanne Recruitment and Dayforce are both filed under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773.
| Record | Cezanne Recruitment | Dayforce |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | GB | US |
| Founded | 2012 | 1992 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 43% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Cezanne Recruitment 40 · Dayforce 74
6.8 weighted points to Dayforce
18% weight · 64% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Cezanne Recruitment 24 · Dayforce 42
3.2 weighted points to Dayforce
15% weight · 75% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Cezanne Recruitment 28 · Dayforce 40
1.8 weighted points to Dayforce
15% weight · 84% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Cezanne Recruitment 54 · Dayforce 63
1.3 weighted points to Dayforce
12% weight · 91% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Cezanne Recruitment 58 · Dayforce 68
1.2 weighted points to Dayforce
8% weight · 98% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Cezanne Recruitment 57 · Dayforce 70
1.0 weighted points to Dayforce
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Cezanne Recruitment 44 · Dayforce 47
0.4 weighted points to Dayforce
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -15.8 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 15.8 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -16 beside that -15.8.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Cezanne Recruitment minus Dayforce.
| Category | Weight | Cezanne Recruitment | Dayforce | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 40 | 74 | -34 | -6.8 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 24 | 42 | -18 | -3.2 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 28 | 40 | -12 | -1.8 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 54 | 63 | -9 | -1.3 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 58 | 68 | -10 | -1.2 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 44 | 47 | -3 | -0.4 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 57 | 70 | -13 | -1.0 |
| Total | 100% | 41 (F) | 57 (F) | -16 | -15.8 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Cezanne Recruitment | Dayforce | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 25 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 28 | 6 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
Cezanne Recruitment has 31 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 25 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Dayforce has 34 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 28 with a source URL, 6 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 65 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 31 for Cezanne Recruitment, across 1 distinct source domain, and 34 for Dayforce, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Cezanne Recruitment last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Dayforce last reviewed
- August 2, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next