HomeCompareCezanne Recruitment vs Jobylon

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Cezanne Recruitment vs Jobylon

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

Jobylon leads Cezanne Recruitment on all 7 criteria.

Inside the ATS-integrated cohort, rubric v1.0 puts Jobylon on 48 and Cezanne Recruitment on 41, 7 points apart. Jobylon takes all 7 criteria from Cezanne Recruitment without a 20-point raw gap on any of them; the closest is Post-Market Monitoring, Cezanne Recruitment 44 to Jobylon 45. Article 11 Technical Documentation is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Cezanne Recruitment 40, Jobylon 55 — and at a 20% weight it carries 49% of the weighted advantage Jobylon holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

Cezanne Recruitment and Jobylon are both filed under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773.

RecordCezanne RecruitmentJobylon
Price tierMidMid
HeadquartersGBSE
Founded20122011

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 20% weight · 49% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Cezanne Recruitment 40 · Jobylon 55

    3.0 weighted points to Jobylon

  2. 15% weight · 69% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Cezanne Recruitment 28 · Jobylon 36

    1.2 weighted points to Jobylon

  3. 18% weight · 80% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Cezanne Recruitment 24 · Jobylon 28

    0.7 weighted points to Jobylon

  4. 15% weight · 90% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Cezanne Recruitment 54 · Jobylon 58

    0.6 weighted points to Jobylon

  5. 12% weight · 94% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Cezanne Recruitment 58 · Jobylon 60

    0.2 weighted points to Jobylon

  6. 8% weight · 98% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Cezanne Recruitment 57 · Jobylon 60

    0.2 weighted points to Jobylon

  7. 12% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Cezanne Recruitment 44 · Jobylon 45

    0.1 weighted points to Jobylon

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -6.1 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 6.1 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -7 beside that -6.1.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Cezanne Recruitment minus Jobylon.

CategoryWeightCezanne RecruitmentJobylonΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%4055-15-3.0
Bias Audit Transparency18%2428-4-0.7
FRIA Support15%2836-8-1.2
Data Governance Disclosure15%5458-4-0.6
Human Oversight Design12%5860-2-0.2
Post-Market Monitoring12%4445-1-0.1
Customer Documentation8%5760-3-0.2
Total100%41 (F)48 (F)-7-6.1

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightCezanne RecruitmentJobylon
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%41Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%31Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
FRIA Support15%21Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%41Sources on the vendor's own domain50Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%50Sources on the vendor's own domain50Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%31Sources on the vendor's own domain41Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%41Sources on the vendor's own domain51Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%256Sources on the vendor's own domain285Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain

Cezanne Recruitment has 31 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 25 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Jobylon has 33 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 28 with a source URL, 5 documented absences.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 64 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 31 for Cezanne Recruitment, across 1 distinct source domain, and 33 for Jobylon, across 1 distinct source domain.

Rubric
v1.0
Cezanne Recruitment last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Jobylon last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.