§ The result
Rippling leads Cezanne Recruitment on all 7 criteria.
The ATS-integrated cohort pairing of Rippling and Cezanne Recruitment comes out 56 to 41 under rubric v1.0, a 15-point lead for Rippling. Rippling takes all 7 criteria and Cezanne Recruitment none of them; the nearest contest is Human Oversight Design, Cezanne Recruitment 58 to Rippling 60. Article 11 Technical Documentation is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Cezanne Recruitment 40, Rippling 73 — and at a 20% weight it carries 44% of the weighted advantage Rippling holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Cezanne Recruitment
Cezanne Recruitment (formerly Occupop) is an applicant tracking system for SMEs that handles job posting, candidate management and interview scheduling. In its Recruitment PLUS+ tier it uses AI to score each CV from 0 to 100 against the job description, alongside weighted screening-question scores, knockout filters and optional AI anonymisation of CVs for hiring-manager review.
Vendor profile
Rippling
Rippling Recruiting is an applicant tracking system within Rippling's all-in-one HR/IT/finance platform that uses AI to review and screen job applications, summarize interviewer feedback, transcribe video interviews, flag application fraud, and automate interview scheduling.
§ The record
Cezanne Recruitment and Rippling are both filed under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Colorado AI Act. Only Cezanne Recruitment is in scope of Illinois HB 3773.
| Record | Cezanne Recruitment | Rippling |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | High |
| Headquarters | GB | US |
| Founded | 2012 | 2016 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 44% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Cezanne Recruitment 40 · Rippling 73
6.6 weighted points to Rippling
18% weight · 65% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Cezanne Recruitment 24 · Rippling 42
3.2 weighted points to Rippling
15% weight · 82% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Cezanne Recruitment 28 · Rippling 45
2.5 weighted points to Rippling
15% weight · 92% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Cezanne Recruitment 54 · Rippling 64
1.5 weighted points to Rippling
8% weight · 96% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Cezanne Recruitment 57 · Rippling 64
0.6 weighted points to Rippling
12% weight · 98% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Cezanne Recruitment 44 · Rippling 47
0.4 weighted points to Rippling
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Cezanne Recruitment 58 · Rippling 60
0.2 weighted points to Rippling
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -15.1 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 15.1 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -15 beside that -15.1.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Cezanne Recruitment minus Rippling.
| Category | Weight | Cezanne Recruitment | Rippling | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 40 | 73 | -33 | -6.6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 24 | 42 | -18 | -3.2 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 28 | 45 | -17 | -2.5 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 54 | 64 | -10 | -1.5 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 58 | 60 | -2 | -0.2 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 44 | 47 | -3 | -0.4 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 57 | 64 | -7 | -0.6 |
| Total | 100% | 41 (F) | 56 (F) | -15 | -15.1 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Cezanne Recruitment | Rippling | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 25 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 12 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
Cezanne Recruitment has 31 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 25 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Rippling has 13 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 12 with a source URL, 1 documented absence.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 44 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 31 for Cezanne Recruitment, across 1 distinct source domain, and 13 for Rippling, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Cezanne Recruitment last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Rippling last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next