HomeCompareClasset vs softgarden

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Classet vs softgarden

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

Classet leads softgarden by 13 points.

Classet, filed under Screening, comes out 13 points above softgarden, filed under ATS-integrated: 55 against 42 under rubric v1.0. Classet leads 6 of the 7 criteria, including Bias Audit Transparency, while softgarden leads 1, including Human Oversight Design. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Classet 76, softgarden 22 — and at an 18% weight it carries 72% of the weighted advantage Classet holds across the 6 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

Classet is filed under Screening AI, softgarden under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773.

RecordClassetsoftgarden
Price tierMidMid
HeadquartersUSDE
Founded20212001

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 71% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Classet 76 · softgarden 22

    9.7 weighted points to Classet

  2. 12% weight · 83% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Classet 58 · softgarden 44

    1.7 weighted points to Classet

  3. 20% weight · 89% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Classet 46 · softgarden 42

    0.8 weighted points to Classet

  4. 15% weight · 92% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Classet 33 · softgarden 30

    0.4 weighted points to Classet

  5. 15% weight · 95% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Classet 57 · softgarden 54

    0.4 weighted points to Classet

  6. 12% weight · 98% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Classet 55 · softgarden 58

    0.4 weighted points to softgarden

  7. 8% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Classet 62 · softgarden 58

    0.3 weighted points to Classet

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +13.1 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 13.8 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +13 beside that +13.1.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Classet minus softgarden.

CategoryWeightClassetsoftgardenΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%4642+4+0.8
Bias Audit Transparency18%7622+54+9.7
FRIA Support15%3330+3+0.4
Data Governance Disclosure15%5754+3+0.4
Human Oversight Design12%5558-3-0.4
Post-Market Monitoring12%5844+14+1.7
Customer Documentation8%6258+4+0.3
Total100%55 (F)42 (F)+13+13.1

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightClassetsoftgarden
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%41Sources on the vendor's own domain61Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%40Audit reportSources on a separate domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
FRIA Support15%31Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%41Sources on the vendor's own domain70Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%80Sources on the vendor's own domain50Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%51Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain51Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%51Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%335Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain315Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain

Classet has 38 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 33 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; softgarden has 36 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 31 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Classet sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 74 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 38 for Classet, across 3 distinct source domains, and 36 for softgarden, across 3 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Classet last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
softgarden last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.