§ The result
Greenhouse leads ConverzAI on all 7 criteria.
Under rubric v1.0, Greenhouse (ATS-integrated) opens a 23-point lead on ConverzAI (Screening), 67 (D) to 44 (F). ConverzAI leads none of the 7 criteria, and Greenhouse is ahead on 3 of them by 20 raw points or more, Article 11 Technical Documentation among them. Article 11 Technical Documentation is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — ConverzAI 30, Greenhouse 78 — and at a 20% weight it carries 43% of the weighted advantage Greenhouse holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
ConverzAI
ConverzAI's Virtual Recruiter is an agentic voice, SMS and email AI agent for staffing firms. It contacts applicants within minutes, runs role-specific screening interviews, scores candidates' fit to open jobs and updates the firm's ATS.
Vendor profile
Greenhouse
End-to-end applicant tracking system and structured-hiring platform, now layered with 'Greenhouse AI' features such as resume parsing, Talent Matching, and interview summarisation.
§ The record
ConverzAI is filed under Screening AI, Greenhouse under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Sourcing.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773.
| Record | ConverzAI | Greenhouse |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2019 | 2012 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 43% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
ConverzAI 30 · Greenhouse 78
9.6 weighted points to Greenhouse
15% weight · 59% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
ConverzAI 40 · Greenhouse 64
3.6 weighted points to Greenhouse
18% weight · 70% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
ConverzAI 72 · Greenhouse 86
2.5 weighted points to Greenhouse
12% weight · 81% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
ConverzAI 45 · Greenhouse 66
2.5 weighted points to Greenhouse
15% weight · 89% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
ConverzAI 30 · Greenhouse 42
1.8 weighted points to Greenhouse
8% weight · 96% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
ConverzAI 45 · Greenhouse 64
1.5 weighted points to Greenhouse
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
ConverzAI 50 · Greenhouse 58
1.0 weighted points to Greenhouse
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -22.5 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 22.5 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -23 beside that -22.5.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is ConverzAI minus Greenhouse.
| Category | Weight | ConverzAI | Greenhouse | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 30 | 78 | -48 | -9.6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 72 | 86 | -14 | -2.5 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 30 | 42 | -12 | -1.8 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 40 | 64 | -24 | -3.6 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 45 | 66 | -21 | -2.5 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 50 | 58 | -8 | -1.0 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 45 | 64 | -19 | -1.5 |
| Total | 100% | 44 (F) | 67 (D) | -23 | -22.5 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | ConverzAI | Greenhouse | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 6 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 2 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 24 | 6 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 16 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
ConverzAI has 30 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 24 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Greenhouse has 17 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 16 with a source URL, 1 documented absence; some documentation or audit rows for ConverzAI and Greenhouse sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 47 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 30 for ConverzAI, across 3 distinct source domains, and 17 for Greenhouse, across 3 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- ConverzAI last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Greenhouse last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next