§ The result
Hireology leads ConverzAI on all 7 criteria.
Hireology sits 13 points above ConverzAI under rubric v1.0 — 57 against 44 — with Hireology filed under ATS-integrated and ConverzAI under Screening. Hireology takes all 7 criteria and ConverzAI none of them; the nearest contest is FRIA Support, ConverzAI 30 to Hireology 35. The advantage Hireology holds is spread out: Article 11 Technical Documentation is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (ConverzAI 30, Hireology 50, 20% weight), yet it supplies only 33% of the weighted points Hireology gains across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
ConverzAI
ConverzAI's Virtual Recruiter is an agentic voice, SMS and email AI agent for staffing firms. It contacts applicants within minutes, runs role-specific screening interviews, scores candidates' fit to open jobs and updates the firm's ATS.
Vendor profile
Hireology
Hireology is an applicant tracking and hiring platform for multi-location auto dealers, healthcare providers and hospitality operators. Its AI features score applicants against employer-defined criteria (AI Match) and run rubric-scored, voice-based first-round screening interviews (AI Interview).
§ The record
ConverzAI is filed under Screening AI, Hireology under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773.
| Record | ConverzAI | Hireology |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2019 | 2010 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 33% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
ConverzAI 30 · Hireology 50
4.0 weighted points to Hireology
18% weight · 49% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
ConverzAI 72 · Hireology 83
2.0 weighted points to Hireology
15% weight · 64% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
ConverzAI 40 · Hireology 52
1.8 weighted points to Hireology
12% weight · 76% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
ConverzAI 45 · Hireology 57
1.4 weighted points to Hireology
12% weight · 85% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
ConverzAI 50 · Hireology 59
1.1 weighted points to Hireology
8% weight · 94% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
ConverzAI 45 · Hireology 58
1.0 weighted points to Hireology
15% weight · 100% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
ConverzAI 30 · Hireology 35
0.8 weighted points to Hireology
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -12.1 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 12.1 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -13 beside that -12.1.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is ConverzAI minus Hireology.
| Category | Weight | ConverzAI | Hireology | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 30 | 50 | -20 | -4.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 72 | 83 | -11 | -2.0 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 30 | 35 | -5 | -0.8 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 40 | 52 | -12 | -1.8 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 45 | 57 | -12 | -1.4 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 50 | 59 | -9 | -1.1 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 45 | 58 | -13 | -1.0 |
| Total | 100% | 44 (F) | 57 (F) | -13 | -12.1 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | ConverzAI | Hireology | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain | 3 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 6 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 4 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain | 2 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 24 | 6 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 25 | 4 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
ConverzAI has 30 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 24 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Hireology has 29 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 25 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for ConverzAI and Hireology sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 59 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 30 for ConverzAI, across 3 distinct source domains, and 29 for Hireology, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- ConverzAI last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Hireology last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next