HomeCompareCrosschq vs SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Crosschq vs SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting leads Crosschq on 4 of the 7 criteria.

Under rubric v1.0, SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting, filed under ATS-integrated, finishes on 53 and Crosschq, filed under Screening, on 47, 6 points apart. Crosschq is ahead on none of the 7 criteria: SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting takes 4, the remaining 3 are level, and the nearest of those 4 is Bias Audit Transparency, Crosschq 38 to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 40. Article 11 Technical Documentation is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Crosschq 50, SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 70 — and at a 20% weight it carries 74% of the weighted advantage SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting holds across the 4 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

Crosschq is filed under Screening AI, SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773 and Colorado AI Act. Only Crosschq is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.

RecordCrosschqSAP SuccessFactors Recruiting
Price tierMidEnterprise
HeadquartersUSDE
Founded20181972

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 20% weight · 74% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Crosschq 50 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 70

    4.0 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

  2. 15% weight · 88% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Crosschq 30 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 35

    0.8 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

  3. 18% weight · 94% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Crosschq 38 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 40

    0.4 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

  4. 15% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Crosschq 58 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 60

    0.3 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 4 figures above sum to -5.4 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 5.4 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -6 beside that -5.4.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Crosschq minus SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting.

CategoryWeightCrosschqSAP SuccessFactors RecruitingΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%5070-20-4.0
Bias Audit Transparency18%3840-2-0.4
FRIA Support15%3035-5-0.8
Data Governance Disclosure15%5860-2-0.3
Human Oversight Design12%6262--
Post-Market Monitoring12%4040--
Customer Documentation8%6262--
Total100%47 (F)53 (F)-6-5.4

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightCrosschqSAP SuccessFactors Recruiting
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%61Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain41Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%61Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on a separate domain
FRIA Support15%21Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%70Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain20Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%70Sources on the vendor's own domain30Sources on a separate domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%41Sources on the vendor's own domain21Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%61Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%385Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain175Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

Crosschq has 43 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 38 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting has 22 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 17 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Crosschq and SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 65 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 43 for Crosschq, across 3 distinct source domains, and 22 for SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting, across 3 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Crosschq last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.