HomeCompareDarwinbox vs SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Darwinbox vs SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting leads Darwinbox on all 7 criteria.

SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting scores 53 and Darwinbox 46 under rubric v1.0 — a 7-point gap inside the ATS-integrated cohort. SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting takes all 7 criteria from Darwinbox without a 20-point raw gap on any of them; the closest is Data Governance Disclosure, Darwinbox 58 to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 60. Bias Audit Transparency is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (Darwinbox 28, SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 40, 18% weight), but it accounts for only 31% of the weighted advantage SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

Darwinbox and SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting are both filed under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 2 secondary categories: Screening and Sourcing.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773.

RecordDarwinboxSAP SuccessFactors Recruiting
Price tierEnterpriseEnterprise
HeadquartersINDE
Founded20151972

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 31% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Darwinbox 28 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 40

    2.2 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

  2. 20% weight · 59% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Darwinbox 60 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 70

    2.0 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

  3. 12% weight · 71% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Darwinbox 55 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 62

    0.8 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

  4. 15% weight · 82% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Darwinbox 30 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 35

    0.8 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

  5. 12% weight · 90% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Darwinbox 35 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 40

    0.6 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

  6. 8% weight · 96% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Darwinbox 57 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 62

    0.4 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

  7. 15% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Darwinbox 58 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 60

    0.3 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -7.0 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 7.0 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -7 beside that -7.0.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Darwinbox minus SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting.

CategoryWeightDarwinboxSAP SuccessFactors RecruitingΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%6070-10-2.0
Bias Audit Transparency18%2840-12-2.2
FRIA Support15%3035-5-0.8
Data Governance Disclosure15%5860-2-0.3
Human Oversight Design12%5562-7-0.8
Post-Market Monitoring12%3540-5-0.6
Customer Documentation8%5762-5-0.4
Total100%46 (F)53 (F)-7-7.0

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightDarwinboxSAP SuccessFactors Recruiting
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%41Sources on the vendor's own domain41Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%31—21Sources on a separate domain
FRIA Support15%11Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%51Sources on the vendor's own domain20Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%41Sources on the vendor's own domain30Sources on a separate domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%31Sources on the vendor's own domain21Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%41Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%247Sources on the vendor's own domain175Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

Darwinbox has 31 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 24 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting has 22 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 17 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 53 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 31 for Darwinbox, across 1 distinct source domain, and 22 for SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting, across 3 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Darwinbox last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.