§ The result
Dayforce leads Jobylon on all 7 criteria.
Dayforce scores 57 and Jobylon 48 under rubric v1.0 — a 9-point gap inside the ATS-integrated cohort. Dayforce takes all 7 criteria from Jobylon without a 20-point raw gap on any of them; the closest is Post-Market Monitoring, Dayforce 47 to Jobylon 45. Even Article 11 Technical Documentation, the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (Dayforce 74, Jobylon 55, 20% weight), is only 39% of the weighted advantage Dayforce builds across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
Dayforce
Dayforce is an enterprise human capital management platform whose Dayforce Recruiting module uses AI to assign letter grades to external job applicants, generate job descriptions, and automate screening and hiring workflows alongside HR, payroll, time, talent, and analytics.
Vendor profile
Jobylon
Jobylon is a Stockholm-based applicant tracking system and talent CRM for enterprise employers whose optional AI features score each applicant's CV against the job description, suggest existing candidates for other open roles, draft job ads and screening questions, and run candidate screening and interview scheduling over WhatsApp, SMS and email.
§ The record
Dayforce and Jobylon are both filed under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773.
| Record | Dayforce | Jobylon |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | SE |
| Founded | 1992 | 2011 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 39% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Dayforce 74 · Jobylon 55
3.8 weighted points to Dayforce
18% weight · 65% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Dayforce 42 · Jobylon 28
2.5 weighted points to Dayforce
12% weight · 75% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Dayforce 68 · Jobylon 60
1.0 weighted points to Dayforce
8% weight · 84% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Dayforce 70 · Jobylon 60
0.8 weighted points to Dayforce
15% weight · 91% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Dayforce 63 · Jobylon 58
0.8 weighted points to Dayforce
15% weight · 98% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Dayforce 40 · Jobylon 36
0.6 weighted points to Dayforce
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Dayforce 47 · Jobylon 45
0.2 weighted points to Dayforce
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +9.7 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 9.7 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +9 beside that +9.7.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Dayforce minus Jobylon.
| Category | Weight | Dayforce | Jobylon | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 74 | 55 | +19 | +3.8 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 42 | 28 | +14 | +2.5 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 40 | 36 | +4 | +0.6 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 63 | 58 | +5 | +0.8 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 68 | 60 | +8 | +1.0 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 47 | 45 | +2 | +0.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 70 | 60 | +10 | +0.8 |
| Total | 100% | 57 (F) | 48 (F) | +9 | +9.7 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Dayforce | Jobylon | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 28 | 6 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 28 | 5 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
Dayforce has 34 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 28 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Jobylon has 33 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 28 with a source URL, 5 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 67 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 34 for Dayforce, across 1 distinct source domain, and 33 for Jobylon, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Dayforce last reviewed
- August 2, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Jobylon last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next