HomeCompareEmi vs SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Emi vs SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting leads Emi on all 7 criteria.

Under rubric v1.0, SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting (ATS-integrated) opens a 20-point lead on Emi (Screening), 53 to 33. SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting leads every one of the 7 criteria, Emi none of them, and the closest of the 7 is Post-Market Monitoring, Emi 35 to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 40. Article 11 Technical Documentation is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Emi 28, SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 70 — and at a 20% weight it carries 42% of the weighted advantage SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

Emi is filed under Screening AI, SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Sourcing.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773.

RecordEmiSAP SuccessFactors Recruiting
Price tierMidEnterprise
HeadquartersARDE
Founded20171972

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 20% weight · 42% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Emi 28 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 70

    8.4 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

  2. 18% weight · 61% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Emi 18 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 40

    4.0 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

  3. 15% weight · 73% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Emi 44 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 60

    2.4 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

  4. 12% weight · 84% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Emi 44 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 62

    2.2 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

  5. 15% weight · 91% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Emi 25 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 35

    1.5 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

  6. 8% weight · 97% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Emi 48 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 62

    1.1 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

  7. 12% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Emi 35 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 40

    0.6 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -20.1 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 20.1 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -20 beside that -20.1.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Emi minus SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting.

CategoryWeightEmiSAP SuccessFactors RecruitingΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%2870-42-8.4
Bias Audit Transparency18%1840-22-4.0
FRIA Support15%2535-10-1.5
Data Governance Disclosure15%4460-16-2.4
Human Oversight Design12%4462-18-2.2
Post-Market Monitoring12%3540-5-0.6
Customer Documentation8%4862-14-1.1
Total100%33 (F)53 (F)-20-20.1

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightEmiSAP SuccessFactors Recruiting
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%31Sources on the vendor's own domain41Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%21—21Sources on a separate domain
FRIA Support15%11Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%51Sources on the vendor's own domain20Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%31Sources on the vendor's own domain30Sources on a separate domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%21Sources on a separate domain21Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%31Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%197Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain175Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

Emi has 26 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 19 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting has 22 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 17 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Emi and SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 48 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 26 for Emi, across 3 distinct source domains, and 22 for SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting, across 3 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Emi last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.