HomeCompareFountain vs Jobvite

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Fountain vs Jobvite

Export comparison (CSV)Pro

§ The result

1 point separates Jobvite and Fountain.

Jobvite (ATS-integrated) edges Fountain (Screening) by 1 point under rubric v1.0, 45 to 44. Fountain and Jobvite each lead 2 of the 7 criteria, with 3 level, though the side of the split Jobvite holds (headed by Bias Audit Transparency) adds up to more weighted points. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Fountain 30, Jobvite 38 — and at an 18% weight it carries 75% of the weighted advantage Jobvite holds across the 2 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

Fountain is filed under Screening AI, Jobvite under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Sourcing.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773.

RecordFountainJobvite
Price tierEnterpriseEnterprise
HeadquartersUSUS
Founded20142006

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 57% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Fountain 30 · Jobvite 38

    1.4 weighted points to Jobvite

  2. 8% weight · 76% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Fountain 52 · Jobvite 58

    0.5 weighted points to Jobvite

  3. 12% weight · 90% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Fountain 58 · Jobvite 55

    0.4 weighted points to Fountain

  4. 12% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Fountain 40 · Jobvite 38

    0.2 weighted points to Fountain

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 4 figures above sum to -1.3 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 2.5 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -1 beside that -1.3.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Fountain minus Jobvite.

CategoryWeightFountainJobviteΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%5050--
Bias Audit Transparency18%3038-8-1.4
FRIA Support15%3030--
Data Governance Disclosure15%5555--
Human Oversight Design12%5855+3+0.4
Post-Market Monitoring12%4038+2+0.2
Customer Documentation8%5258-6-0.5
Total100%44 (F)45 (F)-1-1.3

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightFountainJobvite
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%21Sources on the vendor's own domain30Sources on a separate domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%2121Sources on the vendor's own domain
FRIA Support15%11Sources on the vendor's own domain12
Data Governance Disclosure15%21Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Human Oversight Design12%30Sources on the vendor's own domain20
Post-Market Monitoring12%21Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%21Sources on the vendor's own domain30Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
All criteria100%146Sources on the vendor's own domain155Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

Fountain has 20 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 14 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Jobvite has 19 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 15 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Jobvite sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 39 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 20 for Fountain, across 2 distinct source domains, and 19 for Jobvite, across 3 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Fountain last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Jobvite last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.