HomeCompareFountain vs Recruitee

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Fountain vs Recruitee

Export comparison (CSV)Pro

§ The result

2 points separate Fountain and Recruitee.

Fountain (Screening) edges Recruitee (ATS-integrated) by 2 points under rubric v1.0, 44 to 42. Fountain leads 3 of the 7 criteria, including Article 11 Technical Documentation, while Recruitee leads 1, including Customer Documentation, and 3 are level. Article 11 Technical Documentation is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Fountain 50, Recruitee 42 — and at a 20% weight it carries 64% of the weighted advantage Fountain holds across the 3 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

Fountain is filed under Screening AI, Recruitee under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Sourcing.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773.

RecordFountainRecruitee
Price tierEnterpriseMid
HeadquartersUSNL
Founded20142015

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 20% weight · 54% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Fountain 50 · Recruitee 42

    1.6 weighted points to Fountain

  2. 8% weight · 70% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Fountain 52 · Recruitee 58

    0.5 weighted points to Recruitee

  3. 15% weight · 85% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Fountain 30 · Recruitee 27

    0.4 weighted points to Fountain

  4. 15% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Fountain 55 · Recruitee 52

    0.4 weighted points to Fountain

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 4 figures above sum to +2.0 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 3.0 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +2 beside that +2.0.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Fountain minus Recruitee.

CategoryWeightFountainRecruiteeΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%5042+8+1.6
Bias Audit Transparency18%3030--
FRIA Support15%3027+3+0.4
Data Governance Disclosure15%5552+3+0.4
Human Oversight Design12%5858--
Post-Market Monitoring12%4040--
Customer Documentation8%5258-6-0.5
Total100%44 (F)42 (F)+2+2.0

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightFountainRecruitee
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%21Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%2111
FRIA Support15%11Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%21Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%30Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%21Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%21Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%146Sources on the vendor's own domain147Sources on the vendor's own domain

Fountain has 20 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 14 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Recruitee has 21 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 14 with a source URL, 7 documented absences.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 41 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 20 for Fountain, across 2 distinct source domains, and 21 for Recruitee, across 1 distinct source domain.

Rubric
v1.0
Fountain last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Recruitee last reviewed
July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.