HomeCompareFountain vs SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Fountain vs SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

Export comparison (CSV)Pro

§ The result

SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting leads Fountain on 6 of the 7 criteria.

SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting scores 53 and Fountain 44 under rubric v1.0, a 9-point gap across the ATS-integrated and Screening cohorts. SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting leads 6 of the 7 criteria and the remaining criterion is level, so Fountain is ahead on none of them; the closest of the 6 SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting leads is Human Oversight Design, Fountain 58 to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 62. Article 11 Technical Documentation is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Fountain 50, SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 70 — and at a 20% weight it carries 47% of the weighted advantage SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting holds across the 6 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

Fountain is filed under Screening AI, SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Sourcing.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773.

RecordFountainSAP SuccessFactors Recruiting
Price tierEnterpriseEnterprise
HeadquartersUSDE
Founded20141972

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 20% weight · 47% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Fountain 50 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 70

    4.0 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

  2. 18% weight · 68% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Fountain 30 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 40

    1.8 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

  3. 8% weight · 77% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Fountain 52 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 62

    0.8 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

  4. 15% weight · 86% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Fountain 30 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 35

    0.8 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

  5. 15% weight · 94% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Fountain 55 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 60

    0.8 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

  6. 12% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Fountain 58 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 62

    0.5 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to -8.6 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 8.6 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -9 beside that -8.6.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Fountain minus SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting.

CategoryWeightFountainSAP SuccessFactors RecruitingΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%5070-20-4.0
Bias Audit Transparency18%3040-10-1.8
FRIA Support15%3035-5-0.8
Data Governance Disclosure15%5560-5-0.8
Human Oversight Design12%5862-4-0.5
Post-Market Monitoring12%4040--
Customer Documentation8%5262-10-0.8
Total100%44 (F)53 (F)-9-8.6

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightFountainSAP SuccessFactors Recruiting
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%21Sources on the vendor's own domain41Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%2121Sources on a separate domain
FRIA Support15%11Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%21Sources on the vendor's own domain20Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%30Sources on the vendor's own domain30Sources on a separate domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%21Sources on the vendor's own domain21Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%21Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%146Sources on the vendor's own domain175Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

Fountain has 20 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 14 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting has 22 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 17 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 42 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 20 for Fountain, across 2 distinct source domains, and 22 for SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting, across 3 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Fountain last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.