Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Greenhouse vs HiBob
Greenhouse
End-to-end applicant tracking system and structured-hiring platform, now layered with 'Greenhouse AI' features such as resume parsing, Talent Matching, and interview summarisation.
Concerning
ATS-integrated
HiBob
HiBob's Bob is an all-in-one HR platform whose Bob Hiring applicant tracking module uses AI to give each application an explainable match score against recruiter-defined criteria (AI CV Matching) and to draft job descriptions, interview scorecards and candidate emails.
Substantial gaps
ATS-integrated
The result
Greenhouse leads HiBob on all 7 criteria.
Under rubric v1.0, Greenhouse opens a 21-point lead on HiBob, 67 (D) to 46 (F), with both scored in the ATS-integrated cohort. Of the 7 criteria HiBob wins none, and the narrowest lead Greenhouse holds is on Human Oversight Design, Greenhouse 66 to HiBob 63. One criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, is both the widest raw gap (Greenhouse 86, HiBob 20) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 18% weight it makes up 58% of the weighted advantage Greenhouse holds across the 7 criteria it leads.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- Greenhouse7
- HiBob0
- Widest raw gap
- Bias Audit Transparency86 vs 20
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Bias Audit Transparency18% weight
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
Greenhouse and HiBob are both filed under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of
| Record | Greenhouse | HiBob |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | GB |
| Founded | 2012 | 2015 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight58% of the movement so far
Greenhouse86HiBob2011.9 weighted points to Greenhouse
- 2
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight80% of the movement so far
Greenhouse78HiBob554.6 weighted points to Greenhouse
- 3
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight87% of the movement so far
Greenhouse58HiBob471.3 weighted points to Greenhouse
- 4
FRIA Support
15% weight92% of the movement so far
Greenhouse42HiBob351.1 weighted points to Greenhouse
- 5
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight97% of the movement so far
Greenhouse64HiBob571.1 weighted points to Greenhouse
- 6
Human Oversight Design
12% weight99% of the movement so far
Greenhouse66HiBob630.4 weighted points to Greenhouse
- 7
Customer Documentation
8% weight100% of the movement so far
Greenhouse64HiBob610.2 weighted points to Greenhouse
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +20.5 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 20.5 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +21 beside that +20.5.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Greenhouse minus HiBob, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | Greenhouse | HiBob | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 78 | 55 | +23 | +4.6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 86 | 20 | +66 | +11.9 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 42 | 35 | +7 | +1.1 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 64 | 57 | +7 | +1.1 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 66 | 63 | +3 | +0.4 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 58 | 47 | +11 | +1.3 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 64 | 61 | +3 | +0.2 |
| Total | 100% | 67D | 46F | +21 | +20.5 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Greenhouse | HiBob | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 16 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 29 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Greenhouse has 17 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 16 with a source URL, 1 documented absence; HiBob has 36 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 29 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Greenhouse sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 53 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 17 for Greenhouse, across 3 distinct source domains, and 36 for HiBob, across 4 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Greenhouse last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- HiBob last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.