Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Greenhouse vs iCIMS
Side-by-side scores and evidence under the HireAIScore rubric v1.0. Click a vendor name to jump to the full profile and the cited evidence behind each score.
Vendor profile
Greenhouse
End-to-end applicant tracking system and structured-hiring platform, now layered with 'Greenhouse AI' features such as resume parsing, Talent Matching, and interview summarisation.
Vendor profile
iCIMS
Enterprise talent-acquisition / applicant tracking platform (the iCIMS Talent Cloud) that adds optional AI features — Candidate Ranking, Talent Match, and a GPT-powered Copilot — to source, rank, and engage candidates.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Greenhouse minus iCIMS.
| Category | Weight | Greenhouse | iCIMS | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 78 | 58 | +20 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 86 | 68 | +18 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 42 | 38 | +4 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 64 | 56 | +8 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 66 | 58 | +8 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 58 | 42 | +16 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 64 | 62 | +2 |
| Total | 100% | 67 (D) | 55 (F) | +12 |
§ Evidence summary
Evidence count
Greenhouse
17 rows across 7 categories
- documentation
- 11
- public statement
- 3
- audit report
- 2
- absence
- 1
Evidence count
iCIMS
24 rows across 7 categories
- documentation
- 16
- audit report
- 3
- public statement
- 2
- absence
- 3