Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Greenhouse vs impress.ai
Side-by-side scores and evidence under the HireAIScore rubric v1.0. Click a vendor name to jump to the full profile and the cited evidence behind each score.
Export comparison (CSV)Pro→Vendor profile
Greenhouse
End-to-end applicant tracking system and structured-hiring platform, now layered with 'Greenhouse AI' features such as resume parsing, Talent Matching, and interview summarisation.
Vendor profile
impress.ai
impress.ai is a Singapore-headquartered recruitment automation platform that uses conversational AI assistants, resume parsing and scoring, and structured competency-based screening to filter, rank and shortlist job candidates, integrating with enterprise ATS systems.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Greenhouse minus impress.ai.
| Category | Weight | Greenhouse | impress.ai | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 78 | 35 | +43 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 86 | 22 | +64 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 42 | 25 | +17 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 64 | 55 | +9 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 66 | 52 | +14 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 58 | 32 | +26 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 64 | 58 | +6 |
| Total | 100% | 67 (D) | 38 (F) | +29 |
§ Evidence summary
Evidence count
Greenhouse
17 rows across 7 categories
- documentation
- 11
- public statement
- 3
- audit report
- 2
- absence
- 1
Evidence count
impress.ai
25 rows across 7 categories
- documentation
- 17
- public statement
- 1
- absence
- 7