Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Greenhouse vs Tengai
Greenhouse
End-to-end applicant tracking system and structured-hiring platform, now layered with 'Greenhouse AI' features such as resume parsing, Talent Matching, and interview summarisation.
Concerning
ATS-integrated
Tengai
Tengai runs structured screening interviews through a browser-based AI avatar and combines candidates' yes/no qualification answers, a Five-Factor-based personality score and recruiter ratings of open answers into an automatically ranked shortlist.
Substantial gaps
Screening
The result
Greenhouse leads Tengai on all 7 criteria.
Rubric v1.0 puts 25 points between Greenhouse (ATS-integrated) and Tengai (Screening): 67 (D) for Greenhouse, 42 (F) for Tengai. Greenhouse leads every one of the 7 criteria and 3 of them by 20 raw points or more, Bias Audit Transparency among them; Tengai leads none. The advantage Greenhouse holds is spread out: Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (Greenhouse 86, Tengai 33, 18% weight), yet it supplies only 38% of the weighted points Greenhouse gains across the 7 criteria it leads.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- Greenhouse7
- Tengai0
- Widest raw gap
- Bias Audit Transparency86 vs 33
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Bias Audit Transparency18% weight
Keep this comparison
Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
Greenhouse is filed under ATS-integrated AI, Tengai under Screening AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of
Only Tengai is in scope of
| Record | Greenhouse | Tengai |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | SE |
| Founded | 2012 | 2019 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight38% of the movement so far
Greenhouse86Tengai339.5 weighted points to Greenhouse
- 2
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight65% of the movement so far
Greenhouse78Tengai456.6 weighted points to Greenhouse
- 3
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight76% of the movement so far
Greenhouse58Tengai333.0 weighted points to Greenhouse
- 4
FRIA Support
15% weight85% of the movement so far
Greenhouse42Tengai282.1 weighted points to Greenhouse
- 5
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight93% of the movement so far
Greenhouse64Tengai502.1 weighted points to Greenhouse
- 6
Human Oversight Design
12% weight97% of the movement so far
Greenhouse66Tengai581.0 weighted points to Greenhouse
- 7
Customer Documentation
8% weight100% of the movement so far
Greenhouse64Tengai550.7 weighted points to Greenhouse
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +25.0 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 25.0 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +25 beside that +25.0.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Greenhouse minus Tengai, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | Greenhouse | Tengai | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 78 | 45 | +33 | +6.6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 86 | 33 | +53 | +9.5 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 42 | 28 | +14 | +2.1 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 64 | 50 | +14 | +2.1 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 66 | 58 | +8 | +1.0 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 58 | 33 | +25 | +3.0 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 64 | 55 | +9 | +0.7 |
| Total | 100% | 67D | 42F | +25 | +25.0 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Greenhouse | Tengai | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 7 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 16 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 37 | 5 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Greenhouse has 17 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 16 with a source URL, 1 documented absence; Tengai has 42 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 37 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Greenhouse and Tengai sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 59 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 17 for Greenhouse, across 3 distinct source domains, and 42 for Tengai, across 4 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Greenhouse last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Tengai last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.