§ The result
Greenhouse leads Tezi on 6 of the 7 criteria.
Greenhouse scores 67 (D) and Tezi 58 (F) under rubric v1.0, a 9-point gap across the ATS-integrated and Screening cohorts. Greenhouse leads 6 of the 7 criteria and the remaining criterion is level, so Tezi is ahead on none of them; the closest of the 6 Greenhouse leads is Bias Audit Transparency, Greenhouse 86 to Tezi 83. One criterion, Article 11 Technical Documentation, is both the widest raw gap (Greenhouse 78, Tezi 52) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 20% weight it makes up 57% of the weighted advantage Greenhouse holds across the 6 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
Greenhouse
End-to-end applicant tracking system and structured-hiring platform, now layered with 'Greenhouse AI' features such as resume parsing, Talent Matching, and interview summarisation.
Vendor profile
Tezi
Tezi's product "Max" is an autonomous AI recruiting agent that sources passive candidates, screens and ranks inbound applications via conversational chat, and schedules interviews, integrating with ATS and calendar tools.
§ The record
Greenhouse is filed under ATS-integrated AI, Tezi under Screening AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Sourcing.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773.
| Record | Greenhouse | Tezi |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2012 | 2024 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 57% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Greenhouse 78 · Tezi 52
5.2 weighted points to Greenhouse
15% weight · 71% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Greenhouse 64 · Tezi 55
1.3 weighted points to Greenhouse
8% weight · 84% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Greenhouse 64 · Tezi 50
1.1 weighted points to Greenhouse
15% weight · 90% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Greenhouse 42 · Tezi 38
0.6 weighted points to Greenhouse
18% weight · 96% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Greenhouse 86 · Tezi 83
0.5 weighted points to Greenhouse
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Greenhouse 66 · Tezi 63
0.4 weighted points to Greenhouse
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to +9.2 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 9.2 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +9 beside that +9.2.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Greenhouse minus Tezi.
| Category | Weight | Greenhouse | Tezi | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 78 | 52 | +26 | +5.2 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 86 | 83 | +3 | +0.5 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 42 | 38 | +4 | +0.6 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 64 | 55 | +9 | +1.3 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 66 | 63 | +3 | +0.4 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 58 | 58 | - | - |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 64 | 50 | +14 | +1.1 |
| Total | 100% | 67 (D) | 58 (F) | +9 | +9.2 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Greenhouse | Tezi | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 2 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | — |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 2 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 16 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 11 | 3 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Greenhouse has 17 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 16 with a source URL, 1 documented absence; Tezi has 14 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 11 with a source URL, 3 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Greenhouse and Tezi sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 31 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 17 for Greenhouse, across 3 distinct source domains, and 14 for Tezi, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Greenhouse last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Tezi last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next