HomeCompareGreenhouse vs Wellfound

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Greenhouse vs Wellfound

Export comparison (CSV)Pro

§ The result

Greenhouse leads Wellfound by 15 points.

Greenhouse finishes 15 points clear of Wellfound under rubric v1.0 — 67 (D) against 52 (F) — across the ATS-integrated and Screening cohorts. Greenhouse leads 6 of the 7 criteria, including Article 11 Technical Documentation, while Wellfound leads 1, including Post-Market Monitoring. Article 11 Technical Documentation is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Greenhouse 78, Wellfound 40 — and at a 20% weight it carries 49% of the weighted advantage Greenhouse holds across the 6 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

Greenhouse is filed under ATS-integrated AI, Wellfound under Screening AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Sourcing.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773.

RecordGreenhouseWellfound
Price tierEnterpriseMid
HeadquartersUSUS
Founded20122012

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 20% weight · 49% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Greenhouse 78 · Wellfound 40

    7.6 weighted points to Greenhouse

  2. 15% weight · 67% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Greenhouse 64 · Wellfound 45

    2.9 weighted points to Greenhouse

  3. 15% weight · 80% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Greenhouse 42 · Wellfound 28

    2.1 weighted points to Greenhouse

  4. 12% weight · 91% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Greenhouse 66 · Wellfound 52

    1.7 weighted points to Greenhouse

  5. 18% weight · 95% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Greenhouse 86 · Wellfound 82

    0.7 weighted points to Greenhouse

  6. 8% weight · 98% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Greenhouse 64 · Wellfound 58

    0.5 weighted points to Greenhouse

  7. 12% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Greenhouse 58 · Wellfound 60

    0.2 weighted points to Wellfound

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +15.2 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 15.7 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +15 beside that +15.2.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Greenhouse minus Wellfound.

CategoryWeightGreenhouseWellfoundΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%7840+38+7.6
Bias Audit Transparency18%8682+4+0.7
FRIA Support15%4228+14+2.1
Data Governance Disclosure15%6445+19+2.9
Human Oversight Design12%6652+14+1.7
Post-Market Monitoring12%5860-2-0.2
Customer Documentation8%6458+6+0.5
Total100%67 (D)52 (F)+15+15.2

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightGreenhouseWellfound
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%30Sources on the vendor's own domain22Sources on a separate domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%20Audit reportSources on a separate domain50Audit reportSources on a separate domain
FRIA Support15%11Sources on the vendor's own domain12
Data Governance Disclosure15%20Sources on the vendor's own domain32Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%20Sources on the vendor's own domain41Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%30Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain31Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Customer Documentation8%30Sources on the vendor's own domain41Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%161Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain229Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

Greenhouse has 17 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 16 with a source URL, 1 documented absence; Wellfound has 27 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 22 with a source URL, 9 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Greenhouse and Wellfound sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 44 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 17 for Greenhouse, across 3 distinct source domains, and 27 for Wellfound, across 3 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Greenhouse last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Wellfound last reviewed
August 2, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.