Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Greenhouse vs Zappyhire
Greenhouse
End-to-end applicant tracking system and structured-hiring platform, now layered with 'Greenhouse AI' features such as resume parsing, Talent Matching, and interview summarisation.
Concerning
ATS-integrated
Zappyhire
Zappyhire is an AI-powered recruitment automation platform that screens and ranks candidates through resume parsing, a recruiting chatbot, AI assessments, and robotic video interviews, layered on an applicant tracking system.
Substantial gaps
Screening
The result
Greenhouse leads Zappyhire on all 7 criteria.
Rubric v1.0 puts 33 points between Greenhouse (ATS-integrated) and Zappyhire (Screening): 67 (D) for Greenhouse, 34 (F) for Zappyhire. Greenhouse leads every one of the 7 criteria and 4 of them by 20 raw points or more, Bias Audit Transparency among them; Zappyhire leads none. Bias Audit Transparency is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (Greenhouse 86, Zappyhire 28, 18% weight), but it accounts for only 32% of the weighted advantage Greenhouse holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- Greenhouse7
- Zappyhire0
- Widest raw gap
- Bias Audit Transparency86 vs 28
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Bias Audit Transparency18% weight
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
Greenhouse is filed under ATS-integrated AI, Zappyhire under Screening AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of
Only Zappyhire is in scope of
| Record | Greenhouse | Zappyhire |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | IN |
| Founded | 2012 | 2018 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight32% of the movement so far
Greenhouse86Zappyhire2810.4 weighted points to Greenhouse
- 2
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight61% of the movement so far
Greenhouse78Zappyhire309.6 weighted points to Greenhouse
- 3
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight72% of the movement so far
Greenhouse58Zappyhire283.6 weighted points to Greenhouse
- 4
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight82% of the movement so far
Greenhouse64Zappyhire423.3 weighted points to Greenhouse
- 5
FRIA Support
15% weight90% of the movement so far
Greenhouse42Zappyhire252.5 weighted points to Greenhouse
- 6
Human Oversight Design
12% weight95% of the movement so far
Greenhouse66Zappyhire501.9 weighted points to Greenhouse
- 7
Customer Documentation
8% weight100% of the movement so far
Greenhouse64Zappyhire451.5 weighted points to Greenhouse
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +32.9 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 32.9 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +33 beside that +32.9.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Greenhouse minus Zappyhire, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | Greenhouse | Zappyhire | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 78 | 30 | +48 | +9.6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 86 | 28 | +58 | +10.4 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 42 | 25 | +17 | +2.5 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 64 | 42 | +22 | +3.3 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 66 | 50 | +16 | +1.9 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 58 | 28 | +30 | +3.6 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 64 | 45 | +19 | +1.5 |
| Total | 100% | 67D | 34F | +33 | +32.9 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Greenhouse | Zappyhire | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 2 | 1 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 16 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 12 | 6 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Greenhouse has 17 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 16 with a source URL, 1 documented absence; Zappyhire has 18 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 12 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Greenhouse and Zappyhire sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 35 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 17 for Greenhouse, across 3 distinct source domains, and 18 for Zappyhire, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Greenhouse last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Zappyhire last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.