Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Handshake vs Sense
Handshake
Handshake is an early-career recruiting network whose employer tools use AI to rank applicants against employer-set criteria, find and message matching students and graduates, and target job promotions.
Substantial gaps
Screening
Sense
Sense is a conversational AI talent engagement platform that screens, scores, matches, and schedules candidates for high-volume recruiting via chatbot, SMS/WhatsApp, and voice AI on top of a customer's ATS.
Substantial gaps
Screening
The result
Sense leads Handshake on all 7 criteria.
Sense scores 58 and Handshake 50 under rubric v1.0 — an 8-point gap inside the Screening cohort. Sense leads every one of the 7 criteria, Handshake none of them, and the closest of the 7 is Data Governance Disclosure, Handshake 57 to Sense 58. One criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, is both the widest raw gap (Handshake 52, Sense 72) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 18% weight it makes up 41% of the weighted advantage Sense holds across the 7 criteria it leads.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- Handshake0
- Sense7
- Widest raw gap
- Bias Audit Transparency52 vs 72
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Bias Audit Transparency18% weight
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
Handshake and Sense are both filed under Screening AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Sourcing.
Both are in scope of
| Record | Handshake | Sense |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2014 | 2016 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight41% of the movement so far
Handshake52Sense723.6 weighted points to Sense
- 2
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight69% of the movement so far
Handshake48Sense602.4 weighted points to Sense
- 3
FRIA Support
15% weight83% of the movement so far
Handshake30Sense381.2 weighted points to Sense
- 4
Human Oversight Design
12% weight91% of the movement so far
Handshake58Sense640.7 weighted points to Sense
- 5
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight96% of the movement so far
Handshake48Sense520.5 weighted points to Sense
- 6
Customer Documentation
8% weight98% of the movement so far
Handshake60Sense620.2 weighted points to Sense
- 7
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight100% of the movement so far
Handshake57Sense580.1 weighted points to Sense
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -8.7 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 8.7 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -8 beside that -8.7.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Handshake minus Sense, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | Handshake | Sense | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 48 | 60 | -12 | -2.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 52 | 72 | -20 | -3.6 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 30 | 38 | -8 | -1.2 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 57 | 58 | -1 | -0.1 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 58 | 64 | -6 | -0.7 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 48 | 52 | -4 | -0.5 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 60 | 62 | -2 | -0.2 |
| Total | 100% | 50F | 58F | -8 | -8.7 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Handshake | Sense | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 5 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 27 | 7 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 16 | 3 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Handshake has 34 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 27 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Sense has 19 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 16 with a source URL, 3 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Handshake and Sense sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 53 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 34 for Handshake, across 2 distinct source domains, and 19 for Sense, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Handshake last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Sense last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
Where next
Scored against