Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Harri vs impress.ai
Harri
Harri is a frontline workforce platform for hospitality, grocery and care employers whose pre-hire suite pairs a career portal and applicant tracking system with Carri, a conversational AI assistant that screens applicants and coordinates interviews, plus an agentic AI layer (Salli) for scheduling and labor-law compliance.
Substantial gaps
ATS-integrated
impress.ai
impress.ai is a Singapore-headquartered recruitment automation platform that uses conversational AI assistants, resume parsing and scoring, and structured competency-based screening to filter, rank and shortlist job candidates, integrating with enterprise ATS systems.
Substantial gaps
Screening
The result
3 points separate Harri and impress.ai.
Harri holds a 3-point edge over impress.ai under rubric v1.0, 41 to 38, across the ATS-integrated and Screening cohorts. impress.ai takes 1 of the 7 criteria, Data Governance Disclosure among them, against 3 for Harri, whose share includes FRIA Support, and 3 are level. FRIA Support is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Harri 44, impress.ai 25 — and at a 15% weight it carries 72% of the weighted advantage Harri holds across the 3 criteria on that side of the table.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- Harri3
- impress.ai1
- Level3
- Widest raw gap
- FRIA Support44 vs 25
- Heaviest weighted swing
- FRIA Support15% weight
Keep this comparison
Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
Harri is filed under ATS-integrated AI, impress.ai under Screening AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of
Only impress.ai is in scope of
| Record | Harri | impress.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | High |
| Headquarters | US | SG |
| Founded | 2012 | 2017 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
FRIA Support
15% weight64% of the movement so far
Harri44impress.ai252.9 weighted points to Harri
- 2
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight86% of the movement so far
Harri40impress.ai321.0 weighted points to Harri
- 3
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight96% of the movement so far
Harri52impress.ai550.4 weighted points to impress.ai
- 4
Customer Documentation
8% weight100% of the movement so far
Harri60impress.ai580.2 weighted points to Harri
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 4 figures above sum to +3.5 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 4.4 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +3 beside that +3.5.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Harri minus impress.ai, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | Harri | impress.ai | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 35 | 35 | - | - |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 22 | 22 | - | - |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 44 | 25 | +19 | +2.9 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 52 | 55 | -3 | -0.4 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 52 | 52 | - | - |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 40 | 32 | +8 | +1.0 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 60 | 58 | +2 | +0.2 |
| Total | 100% | 41F | 38F | +3 | +3.5 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Harri | impress.ai | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 19 | 8 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 18 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Harri has 27 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 19 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; impress.ai has 25 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 18 with a source URL, 7 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 52 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 27 for Harri, across 1 distinct source domain, and 25 for impress.ai, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Harri last reviewed
- August 2, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- impress.ai last reviewed
- August 2, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.