Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Harri vs Recruitee
Harri
Harri is a frontline workforce platform for hospitality, grocery and care employers whose pre-hire suite pairs a career portal and applicant tracking system with Carri, a conversational AI assistant that screens applicants and coordinates interviews, plus an agentic AI layer (Salli) for scheduling and labor-law compliance.
Substantial gaps
ATS-integrated
Recruitee
Collaborative applicant tracking system, part of the Tellent group, with AI-assisted features for job-description generation, screening candidates against team-defined criteria, resurfacing past applicants, and summarizing evaluation feedback.
Substantial gaps
ATS-integrated
The result
1 point separates Recruitee and Harri.
Within the ATS-integrated cohort, Recruitee edges Harri by 1 point under rubric v1.0, 42 to 41. Recruitee leads 3 of the 7 criteria, including Bias Audit Transparency, while Harri leads 2, including FRIA Support, and 2 are level. FRIA Support is at once the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing, and it belongs to Harri — Harri 44, Recruitee 27, on a 15% weight — which is 94% of the weighted advantage Harri holds across the 2 criteria on that side of the table.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- Harri2
- Recruitee3
- Level2
- Widest raw gap
- FRIA Support44 vs 27
- Heaviest weighted swing
- FRIA Support15% weight
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
Harri and Recruitee are both filed under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of
| Record | Harri | Recruitee |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | NL |
| Founded | 2012 | 2015 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
FRIA Support
15% weight41% of the movement so far
Harri44Recruitee272.5 weighted points to Harri
- 2
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight64% of the movement so far
Harri22Recruitee301.4 weighted points to Recruitee
- 3
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight86% of the movement so far
Harri35Recruitee421.4 weighted points to Recruitee
- 4
Human Oversight Design
12% weight97% of the movement so far
Harri52Recruitee580.7 weighted points to Recruitee
- 5
Customer Documentation
8% weight100% of the movement so far
Harri60Recruitee580.2 weighted points to Harri
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 5 figures above sum to -0.8 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 6.3 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -1 beside that -0.8.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Harri minus Recruitee, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | Harri | Recruitee | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 35 | 42 | -7 | -1.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 22 | 30 | -8 | -1.4 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 44 | 27 | +17 | +2.5 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 52 | 52 | - | - |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 52 | 58 | -6 | -0.7 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 40 | 40 | - | - |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 60 | 58 | +2 | +0.2 |
| Total | 100% | 41F | 42F | -1 | -0.8 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Harri | Recruitee | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 19 | 8 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 14 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Harri has 27 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 19 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; Recruitee has 21 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 14 with a source URL, 7 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 48 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 27 for Harri, across 1 distinct source domain, and 21 for Recruitee, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Harri last reviewed
- August 2, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Recruitee last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.