Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Harri vs Ribbon
Harri
Harri is a frontline workforce platform for hospitality, grocery and care employers whose pre-hire suite pairs a career portal and applicant tracking system with Carri, a conversational AI assistant that screens applicants and coordinates interviews, plus an agentic AI layer (Salli) for scheduling and labor-law compliance.
Substantial gaps
ATS-integrated
Ribbon
Ribbon is an AI recruiter that runs voice and video screening interviews with applicants around the clock, scores each interview against default and custom rubrics, ranks candidates for recruiter review, and syncs the results to 60+ applicant tracking systems.
Substantial gaps
Screening
The result
Ribbon takes the total, Harri takes more of the criteria.
Ribbon (Screening) edges Harri (ATS-integrated) by 2 points under rubric v1.0, 43 to 41. Harri leads more of the criteria than Ribbon — 4 to 3 — but Bias Audit Transparency, which Ribbon leads, carries 18% of the rubric, and the weighted sum still falls to Ribbon. One criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, is both the widest raw gap (Harri 22, Ribbon 38) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 18% weight it makes up 62% of the weighted advantage Ribbon holds across the 3 criteria it leads.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- Harri4
- Ribbon3
- Widest raw gap
- Bias Audit Transparency22 vs 38
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Bias Audit Transparency18% weight
Keep this comparison
Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
Harri is filed under ATS-integrated AI, Ribbon under Screening AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of
Only Ribbon is in scope of
| Record | Harri | Ribbon |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Low |
| Headquarters | US | CA |
| Founded | 2012 | 2020 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight41% of the movement so far
Harri22Ribbon382.9 weighted points to Ribbon
- 2
FRIA Support
15% weight64% of the movement so far
Harri44Ribbon331.6 weighted points to Harri
- 3
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight83% of the movement so far
Harri35Ribbon421.4 weighted points to Ribbon
- 4
Human Oversight Design
12% weight88% of the movement so far
Harri52Ribbon550.4 weighted points to Ribbon
- 5
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight94% of the movement so far
Harri40Ribbon370.4 weighted points to Harri
- 6
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight98% of the movement so far
Harri52Ribbon500.3 weighted points to Harri
- 7
Customer Documentation
8% weight100% of the movement so far
Harri60Ribbon580.2 weighted points to Harri
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -2.2 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 7.1 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -2 beside that -2.2.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Harri minus Ribbon, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | Harri | Ribbon | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 35 | 42 | -7 | -1.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 22 | 38 | -16 | -2.9 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 44 | 33 | +11 | +1.6 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 52 | 50 | +2 | +0.3 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 52 | 55 | -3 | -0.4 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 40 | 37 | +3 | +0.4 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 60 | 58 | +2 | +0.2 |
| Total | 100% | 41F | 43F | -2 | -2.2 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Harri | Ribbon | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 19 | 8 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 31 | 4 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Harri has 27 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 19 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; Ribbon has 35 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 31 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Ribbon sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 62 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 27 for Harri, across 1 distinct source domain, and 35 for Ribbon, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Harri last reviewed
- August 2, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Ribbon last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.