HomeCompareHiBob vs SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

HiBob vs SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting leads HiBob by 7 points.

SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting scores 53 and HiBob 46 under rubric v1.0 — a 7-point gap inside the ATS-integrated cohort. HiBob takes 2 of the 7 criteria, Post-Market Monitoring among them, against 4 for SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting, whose share includes Bias Audit Transparency, and 1 is level. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — HiBob 20, SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 40 — and at an 18% weight it carries 50% of the weighted advantage SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting holds across the 4 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

HiBob and SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting are both filed under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773.

RecordHiBobSAP SuccessFactors Recruiting
Price tierMidEnterprise
HeadquartersGBDE
Founded20151972

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 44% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    HiBob 20 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 40

    3.6 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

  2. 20% weight · 82% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    HiBob 55 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 70

    3.0 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

  3. 12% weight · 92% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    HiBob 47 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 40

    0.8 weighted points to HiBob

  4. 15% weight · 98% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    HiBob 57 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 60

    0.4 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

  5. 12% weight · 99% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    HiBob 63 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 62

    0.1 weighted points to HiBob

  6. 8% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    HiBob 61 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 62

    0.1 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to -6.2 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 8.1 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -7 beside that -6.2.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is HiBob minus SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting.

CategoryWeightHiBobSAP SuccessFactors RecruitingΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%5570-15-3.0
Bias Audit Transparency18%2040-20-3.6
FRIA Support15%3535--
Data Governance Disclosure15%5760-3-0.4
Human Oversight Design12%6362+1+0.1
Post-Market Monitoring12%4740+7+0.8
Customer Documentation8%6162-1-0.1
Total100%46 (F)53 (F)-7-6.2

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightHiBobSAP SuccessFactors Recruiting
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%51Sources on the vendor's own domain41Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%31Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on a separate domain
FRIA Support15%31Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%41Sources on the vendor's own domain20Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%61Sources on the vendor's own domain30Sources on a separate domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%31Sources on the vendor's own domain21Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%51Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%297Sources on the vendor's own domain175Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

HiBob has 36 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 29 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting has 22 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 17 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 58 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 36 for HiBob, across 4 distinct source domains, and 22 for SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting, across 3 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
HiBob last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.