Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Humanly vs iCIMS
Side-by-side scores and evidence under the HireAIScore rubric v1.0. Click a vendor name to jump to the full profile and the cited evidence behind each score.
Vendor profile
Humanly
Conversational AI for high-volume recruiting that engages, screens, and schedules candidates across chat, SMS, email, voice, and video, with structured AI interviews and automated scoring.
Vendor profile
iCIMS
Enterprise talent-acquisition / applicant tracking platform (the iCIMS Talent Cloud) that adds optional AI features — Candidate Ranking, Talent Match, and a GPT-powered Copilot — to source, rank, and engage candidates.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Humanly minus iCIMS.
| Category | Weight | Humanly | iCIMS | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 45 | 58 | -13 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 40 | 68 | -28 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 35 | 38 | -3 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 40 | 56 | -16 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 58 | 58 | — |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 30 | 42 | -12 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 52 | 62 | -10 |
| Total | 100% | 42 (F) | 55 (F) | -13 |
§ Evidence summary
Evidence count
Humanly
18 rows across 7 categories
- documentation
- 9
- absence
- 6
- public statement
- 3
Evidence count
iCIMS
24 rows across 7 categories
- documentation
- 16
- audit report
- 3
- public statement
- 2
- absence
- 3