HomeCompareHumanly vs Recruitee

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Humanly vs Recruitee

Export comparison (CSV)Pro

§ The result

Humanly and Recruitee tie at 42.

Humanly (Screening) and Recruitee (ATS-integrated) tie at 42 under rubric v1.0, arriving there from different criteria. Humanly leads 3 of the 7 criteria and Recruitee 3, with 1 level, yet the two totals land on the same number. Humanly takes the heaviest weighted swing, Bias Audit Transparency at 18% (Humanly 40, Recruitee 30), which is 50% of the weighted advantage Humanly holds; the widest raw gap is a different criterion, Data Governance Disclosure, Humanly 40 to Recruitee 52.

§ The record

Humanly is filed under Screening AI, Recruitee under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773 and Colorado AI Act. Only Humanly is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.

RecordHumanlyRecruitee
Price tierMidMid
HeadquartersUSNL
Founded20182015

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 25% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Humanly 40 · Recruitee 30

    1.8 weighted points to Humanly

  2. 15% weight · 51% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Humanly 40 · Recruitee 52

    1.8 weighted points to Recruitee

  3. 15% weight · 68% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Humanly 35 · Recruitee 27

    1.2 weighted points to Humanly

  4. 12% weight · 85% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Humanly 30 · Recruitee 40

    1.2 weighted points to Recruitee

  5. 20% weight · 93% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Humanly 45 · Recruitee 42

    0.6 weighted points to Humanly

  6. 8% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Humanly 52 · Recruitee 58

    0.5 weighted points to Recruitee

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to +0.1 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 7.1 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads 0 beside that +0.1.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Humanly minus Recruitee.

CategoryWeightHumanlyRecruiteeΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%4542+3+0.6
Bias Audit Transparency18%4030+10+1.8
FRIA Support15%3527+8+1.2
Data Governance Disclosure15%4052-12-1.8
Human Oversight Design12%5858--
Post-Market Monitoring12%3040-10-1.2
Customer Documentation8%5258-6-0.5
Total100%42 (F)42 (F)-+0.1

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightHumanlyRecruitee
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%21Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%21Sources on the vendor's own domain11
FRIA Support15%1111Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%21Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%20Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%11Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%21Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%126Sources on the vendor's own domain147Sources on the vendor's own domain

Humanly has 18 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 12 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Recruitee has 21 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 14 with a source URL, 7 documented absences.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 39 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 18 for Humanly, across 3 distinct source domains, and 21 for Recruitee, across 1 distinct source domain.

Rubric
v1.0
Humanly last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Recruitee last reviewed
July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.