HomeCompareHumanly vs Recruitly

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Humanly vs Recruitly

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

Humanly takes the total, Recruitly takes more of the criteria.

Humanly (Screening) edges Recruitly (ATS-integrated) by 1 point under rubric v1.0, 42 to 41. Recruitly leads more of the criteria than Humanly — 4 to 1 — but Bias Audit Transparency, which Humanly leads, carries 18% of the rubric, and the weighted sum still falls to Humanly. One criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, is both the widest raw gap (Humanly 40, Recruitly 15) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 18% weight it makes up 100% of the weighted advantage Humanly holds across the 1 criterion it leads.

§ The record

Humanly is filed under Screening AI, Recruitly under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773 and Colorado AI Act. Only Humanly is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.

RecordHumanlyRecruitly
Price tierMidLow
HeadquartersUSAE
Founded20182015

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 58% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Humanly 40 · Recruitly 15

    4.5 weighted points to Humanly

  2. 12% weight · 81% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Humanly 30 · Recruitly 45

    1.8 weighted points to Recruitly

  3. 15% weight · 91% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Humanly 40 · Recruitly 45

    0.8 weighted points to Recruitly

  4. 8% weight · 97% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Humanly 52 · Recruitly 58

    0.5 weighted points to Recruitly

  5. 12% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Humanly 58 · Recruitly 60

    0.2 weighted points to Recruitly

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 5 figures above sum to +1.2 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 7.8 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +1 beside that +1.2.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Humanly minus Recruitly.

CategoryWeightHumanlyRecruitlyΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%4545--
Bias Audit Transparency18%4015+25+4.5
FRIA Support15%3535--
Data Governance Disclosure15%4045-5-0.8
Human Oversight Design12%5860-2-0.2
Post-Market Monitoring12%3045-15-1.8
Customer Documentation8%5258-6-0.5
Total100%42 (F)41 (F)+1+1.2

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightHumanlyRecruitly
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%21Sources on the vendor's own domain51Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%21Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
FRIA Support15%11—31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%21Sources on the vendor's own domain41Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%20Sources on the vendor's own domain70Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%11Sources on the vendor's own domain60Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%21Sources on the vendor's own domain41Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%126Sources on the vendor's own domain325Sources on the vendor's own domain

Humanly has 18 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 12 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Recruitly has 37 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 32 with a source URL, 5 documented absences.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 55 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 18 for Humanly, across 3 distinct source domains, and 37 for Recruitly, across 3 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Humanly last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Recruitly last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.