HomeCompareisolved vs SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

isolved vs SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting leads isolved by 6 points.

SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting finishes 6 points ahead of isolved under rubric v1.0, 53 to 47, both scored as ATS-integrated entries. isolved takes 2 of the 7 criteria, Bias Audit Transparency among them, against 5 for SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting, whose share includes Article 11 Technical Documentation. Article 11 Technical Documentation is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — isolved 50, SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 70 — and at a 20% weight it carries 56% of the weighted advantage SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting holds across the 5 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

isolved and SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting are both filed under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773.

RecordisolvedSAP SuccessFactors Recruiting
Price tierMidEnterprise
HeadquartersUSDE
Founded19861972

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 20% weight · 45% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    isolved 50 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 70

    4.0 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

  2. 15% weight · 57% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    isolved 53 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 60

    1.1 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

  3. 18% weight · 67% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    isolved 45 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 40

    0.9 weighted points to isolved

  4. 12% weight · 77% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    isolved 55 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 62

    0.8 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

  5. 12% weight · 86% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    isolved 47 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 40

    0.8 weighted points to isolved

  6. 15% weight · 95% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    isolved 30 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 35

    0.8 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

  7. 8% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    isolved 56 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 62

    0.5 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -5.4 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 8.9 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -6 beside that -5.4.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is isolved minus SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting.

CategoryWeightisolvedSAP SuccessFactors RecruitingΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%5070-20-4.0
Bias Audit Transparency18%4540+5+0.9
FRIA Support15%3035-5-0.8
Data Governance Disclosure15%5360-7-1.1
Human Oversight Design12%5562-7-0.8
Post-Market Monitoring12%4740+7+0.8
Customer Documentation8%5662-6-0.5
Total100%47 (F)53 (F)-6-5.4

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightisolvedSAP SuccessFactors Recruiting
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%31Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain41Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%41Audit reportSources on a separate domain21Sources on a separate domain
FRIA Support15%31Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%60Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain20Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%50Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain30Sources on a separate domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%51Sources on the vendor's own domain21Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%51Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%315Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain175Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

isolved has 36 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 31 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting has 22 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 17 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for isolved and SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 58 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 36 for isolved, across 4 distinct source domains, and 22 for SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting, across 3 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
isolved last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.