HomeCompareJazzHR vs Tenzo AI

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

JazzHR vs Tenzo AI

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

Tenzo AI leads JazzHR on 6 of the 7 criteria.

Tenzo AI, filed under Screening, comes out 12 points above JazzHR, filed under ATS-integrated: 56 against 44 under rubric v1.0. JazzHR is ahead on none of the 7 criteria: Tenzo AI takes 6, the remaining criterion is level, and the nearest of those 6 is Human Oversight Design, JazzHR 58 to Tenzo AI 60. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — JazzHR 35, Tenzo AI 83 — and at an 18% weight it carries 72% of the weighted advantage Tenzo AI holds across the 6 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

JazzHR is filed under ATS-integrated AI, Tenzo AI under Screening AI. They record no secondary category in common.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773. Only Tenzo AI is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.

RecordJazzHRTenzo AI
Price tierLowMid
HeadquartersUSUS
Founded20092024

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 72% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    JazzHR 35 · Tenzo AI 83

    8.6 weighted points to Tenzo AI

  2. 15% weight · 87% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    JazzHR 28 · Tenzo AI 40

    1.8 weighted points to Tenzo AI

  3. 8% weight · 91% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    JazzHR 56 · Tenzo AI 62

    0.5 weighted points to Tenzo AI

  4. 15% weight · 95% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    JazzHR 52 · Tenzo AI 55

    0.4 weighted points to Tenzo AI

  5. 12% weight · 98% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    JazzHR 42 · Tenzo AI 45

    0.4 weighted points to Tenzo AI

  6. 12% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    JazzHR 58 · Tenzo AI 60

    0.2 weighted points to Tenzo AI

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to -12.0 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 12.0 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -12 beside that -12.0.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is JazzHR minus Tenzo AI.

CategoryWeightJazzHRTenzo AIΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%4545--
Bias Audit Transparency18%3583-48-8.6
FRIA Support15%2840-12-1.8
Data Governance Disclosure15%5255-3-0.4
Human Oversight Design12%5860-2-0.2
Post-Market Monitoring12%4245-3-0.4
Customer Documentation8%5662-6-0.5
Total100%44 (F)56 (F)-12-12.0

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightJazzHRTenzo AI
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%31Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain41Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%21—41Audit reportSources on a separate domain
FRIA Support15%21Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%21Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain50Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%31Sources on the vendor's own domain60Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%21Sources on the vendor's own domain31Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Customer Documentation8%31Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain50Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%177Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain304Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

JazzHR has 24 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 17 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Tenzo AI has 34 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 30 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for JazzHR and Tenzo AI sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 58 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 24 for JazzHR, across 2 distinct source domains, and 34 for Tenzo AI, across 2 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
JazzHR last reviewed
August 2, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Tenzo AI last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.