HomeCompareJobvite vs Paycom

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Jobvite vs Paycom

Export comparison (CSV)Pro

§ The result

Paycom leads Jobvite on 3 of the 7 criteria.

Paycom scores 50 and Jobvite 45 under rubric v1.0 — a 5-point gap inside the ATS-integrated cohort. Paycom leads 3 of the 7 criteria and the remaining 4 are level, so Jobvite is ahead on none of them; the closest of the 3 Paycom leads is Customer Documentation, Jobvite 58 to Paycom 60. Article 11 Technical Documentation is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Jobvite 50, Paycom 68 — and at a 20% weight it carries 75% of the weighted advantage Paycom holds across the 3 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

Jobvite and Paycom are both filed under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773.

RecordJobvitePaycom
Price tierEnterpriseEnterprise
HeadquartersUSUS
Founded20061998

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 20% weight · 75% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Jobvite 50 · Paycom 68

    3.6 weighted points to Paycom

  2. 15% weight · 97% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Jobvite 55 · Paycom 62

    1.1 weighted points to Paycom

  3. 8% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Jobvite 58 · Paycom 60

    0.2 weighted points to Paycom

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 3 figures above sum to -4.8 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 4.8 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -5 beside that -4.8.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Jobvite minus Paycom.

CategoryWeightJobvitePaycomΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%5068-18-3.6
Bias Audit Transparency18%3838--
FRIA Support15%3030--
Data Governance Disclosure15%5562-7-1.1
Human Oversight Design12%5555--
Post-Market Monitoring12%3838--
Customer Documentation8%5860-2-0.2
Total100%45 (F)50 (F)-5-4.8

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightJobvitePaycom
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%30Sources on a separate domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%21Sources on the vendor's own domain21Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
FRIA Support15%1211Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%21Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%2021Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%21Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%30Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%155Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain137Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain

Jobvite has 19 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 15 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Paycom has 20 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 13 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Jobvite sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 39 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 19 for Jobvite, across 3 distinct source domains, and 20 for Paycom, across 1 distinct source domain.

Rubric
v1.0
Jobvite last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Paycom last reviewed
July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.