HomeCompareJobylon vs Recruitly

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Jobylon vs Recruitly

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

Jobylon leads Recruitly on 5 of the 7 criteria.

Jobylon scores 48 and Recruitly 41 under rubric v1.0 — a 7-point gap inside the ATS-integrated cohort. Recruitly is ahead on none of the 7 criteria: Jobylon takes 5, the remaining 2 are level, and the nearest of those 5 is FRIA Support, Jobylon 36 to Recruitly 35. Bias Audit Transparency is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (Jobylon 28, Recruitly 15, 18% weight), but it accounts for only 35% of the weighted advantage Jobylon holds across the 5 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

Jobylon and Recruitly are both filed under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 2 secondary categories: Screening and Sourcing.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773.

RecordJobylonRecruitly
Price tierMidLow
HeadquartersSEAE
Founded20112015

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 35% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Jobylon 28 · Recruitly 15

    2.3 weighted points to Jobylon

  2. 20% weight · 66% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Jobylon 55 · Recruitly 45

    2.0 weighted points to Jobylon

  3. 15% weight · 95% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Jobylon 58 · Recruitly 45

    1.9 weighted points to Jobylon

  4. 8% weight · 98% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Jobylon 60 · Recruitly 58

    0.2 weighted points to Jobylon

  5. 15% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Jobylon 36 · Recruitly 35

    0.1 weighted points to Jobylon

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 5 figures above sum to +6.6 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 6.6 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +7 beside that +6.6.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Jobylon minus Recruitly.

CategoryWeightJobylonRecruitlyΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%5545+10+2.0
Bias Audit Transparency18%2815+13+2.3
FRIA Support15%3635+1+0.1
Data Governance Disclosure15%5845+13+1.9
Human Oversight Design12%6060--
Post-Market Monitoring12%4545--
Customer Documentation8%6058+2+0.2
Total100%48 (F)41 (F)+7+6.6

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightJobylonRecruitly
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%31Sources on the vendor's own domain51Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%31Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
FRIA Support15%31Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%50Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain41Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%50Sources on the vendor's own domain70Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%41Sources on the vendor's own domain60Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%51Sources on the vendor's own domain41Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%285Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain325Sources on the vendor's own domain

Jobylon has 33 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 28 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Recruitly has 37 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 32 with a source URL, 5 documented absences.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 70 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 33 for Jobylon, across 1 distinct source domain, and 37 for Recruitly, across 3 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Jobylon last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Recruitly last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.