HomeCompareJobylon vs Sense

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Jobylon vs Sense

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

Sense leads Jobylon on 6 of the 7 criteria.

Sense sits 10 points above Jobylon under rubric v1.0 — 58 against 48 — with Sense filed under Screening and Jobylon under ATS-integrated. Sense leads 6 of the 7 criteria and the remaining criterion is level, so Jobylon is ahead on none of them; the closest of the 6 Sense leads is FRIA Support, Jobylon 36 to Sense 38. One criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, is both the widest raw gap (Jobylon 28, Sense 72) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 18% weight it makes up 74% of the weighted advantage Sense holds across the 6 criteria it leads.

§ The record

Jobylon is filed under ATS-integrated AI, Sense under Screening AI. They also share 2 secondary categories: Sourcing and Scheduling.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773.

RecordJobylonSense
Price tierMidEnterprise
HeadquartersSEUS
Founded20112016

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 74% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Jobylon 28 · Sense 72

    7.9 weighted points to Sense

  2. 20% weight · 83% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Jobylon 55 · Sense 60

    1.0 weighted points to Sense

  3. 12% weight · 91% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Jobylon 45 · Sense 52

    0.8 weighted points to Sense

  4. 12% weight · 96% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Jobylon 60 · Sense 64

    0.5 weighted points to Sense

  5. 15% weight · 99% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Jobylon 36 · Sense 38

    0.3 weighted points to Sense

  6. 8% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Jobylon 60 · Sense 62

    0.2 weighted points to Sense

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to -10.7 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 10.7 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -10 beside that -10.7.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Jobylon minus Sense.

CategoryWeightJobylonSenseΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%5560-5-1.0
Bias Audit Transparency18%2872-44-7.9
FRIA Support15%3638-2-0.3
Data Governance Disclosure15%5858--
Human Oversight Design12%6064-4-0.5
Post-Market Monitoring12%4552-7-0.8
Customer Documentation8%6062-2-0.2
Total100%48 (F)58 (F)-10-10.7

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightJobylonSense
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%31Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%31Sources on the vendor's own domain30Audit reportSources on a separate domain
FRIA Support15%31Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on a separate domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%50Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain30Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%50Sources on the vendor's own domain20Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%41Sources on the vendor's own domain21Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Customer Documentation8%51Sources on the vendor's own domain30Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%285Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain163Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

Jobylon has 33 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 28 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Sense has 19 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 16 with a source URL, 3 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Sense sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 52 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 33 for Jobylon, across 1 distinct source domain, and 19 for Sense, across 2 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Jobylon last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Sense last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.