HomeCompareJobylon vs Tenzo AI

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Jobylon vs Tenzo AI

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

Tenzo AI leads Jobylon by 8 points.

Under rubric v1.0, Tenzo AI, filed under Screening, finishes on 56 and Jobylon, filed under ATS-integrated, on 48, 8 points apart. Jobylon takes 2 of the 7 criteria, Article 11 Technical Documentation among them, against 3 for Tenzo AI, whose share includes Bias Audit Transparency, and 2 are level. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Jobylon 28, Tenzo AI 83 — and at an 18% weight it carries 93% of the weighted advantage Tenzo AI holds across the 3 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

Jobylon is filed under ATS-integrated AI, Tenzo AI under Screening AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Scheduling.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773. Only Tenzo AI is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.

RecordJobylonTenzo AI
Price tierMidMid
HeadquartersSEUS
Founded20112024

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 76% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Jobylon 28 · Tenzo AI 83

    9.9 weighted points to Tenzo AI

  2. 20% weight · 91% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Jobylon 55 · Tenzo AI 45

    2.0 weighted points to Jobylon

  3. 15% weight · 95% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Jobylon 36 · Tenzo AI 40

    0.6 weighted points to Tenzo AI

  4. 15% weight · 99% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Jobylon 58 · Tenzo AI 55

    0.4 weighted points to Jobylon

  5. 8% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Jobylon 60 · Tenzo AI 62

    0.2 weighted points to Tenzo AI

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 5 figures above sum to -8.2 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 13.1 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -8 beside that -8.2.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Jobylon minus Tenzo AI.

CategoryWeightJobylonTenzo AIΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%5545+10+2.0
Bias Audit Transparency18%2883-55-9.9
FRIA Support15%3640-4-0.6
Data Governance Disclosure15%5855+3+0.4
Human Oversight Design12%6060--
Post-Market Monitoring12%4545--
Customer Documentation8%6062-2-0.2
Total100%48 (F)56 (F)-8-8.2

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightJobylonTenzo AI
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%31Sources on the vendor's own domain41Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%31Sources on the vendor's own domain41Audit reportSources on a separate domain
FRIA Support15%31Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%50Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain50Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%50Sources on the vendor's own domain60Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%41Sources on the vendor's own domain31Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Customer Documentation8%51Sources on the vendor's own domain50Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%285Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain304Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

Jobylon has 33 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 28 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Tenzo AI has 34 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 30 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Tenzo AI sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 67 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 33 for Jobylon, across 1 distinct source domain, and 34 for Tenzo AI, across 2 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Jobylon last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Tenzo AI last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.