§ The result
LazyApply leads LockedIn AI by 10 points.
LazyApply sits 10 points above LockedIn AI under rubric js-v1.0 — 37 against 27 — with LazyApply filed under Auto-apply and LockedIn AI under Live interview. LazyApply leads 6 of the 7 criteria, including Application Honesty, while LockedIn AI leads 1, including User Control & Transparency. The widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing fall on different criteria: Effectiveness Evidence (LazyApply 35, LockedIn AI 10) and Application Honesty at 20% (LazyApply 32, LockedIn AI 12), the second being 37% of the weighted advantage LazyApply holds across the 6 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
LazyApply
LazyApply is a Chrome extension that automatically mass-applies to jobs on LinkedIn, Indeed, ZipRecruiter, Dice and Greenhouse by auto-filling application forms from a saved profile, and tracks the submitted applications in an analytics dashboard.
Vendor profile
LockedIn AI
LockedIn AI is a real-time interview copilot that listens to a job seeker's live interview, coding round or online assessment and displays AI-generated answers, code and coaching on their screen, alongside free resume, cover-letter and job-tracking tools.
§ The record
LazyApply is filed under Auto-apply tools, LockedIn AI under Live interview assistance. They also share 1 secondary category: Tracker.
| Record | LazyApply | LockedIn AI |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Low | High |
| Headquarters | IN | US |
| Founded | 2020 | 2024 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 34% of the movement so far
Application Honesty
LazyApply 32 · LockedIn AI 12
4.0 weighted points to LazyApply
12% weight · 60% of the movement so far
Effectiveness Evidence
LazyApply 35 · LockedIn AI 10
3.0 weighted points to LazyApply
15% weight · 79% of the movement so far
Employer & ATS Legitimacy
LazyApply 25 · LockedIn AI 10
2.3 weighted points to LazyApply
15% weight · 88% of the movement so far
User Control & Transparency
LazyApply 33 · LockedIn AI 40
1.1 weighted points to LockedIn AI
10% weight · 95% of the movement so far
Pricing & Cancellation Fairness
LazyApply 42 · LockedIn AI 33
0.9 weighted points to LazyApply
20% weight · 99% of the movement so far
Data & Credential Safety
LazyApply 50 · LockedIn AI 48
0.4 weighted points to LazyApply
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Support & Accountability
LazyApply 42 · LockedIn AI 40
0.2 weighted points to LazyApply
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +9.7 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 11.8 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +10 beside that +9.7.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is LazyApply minus LockedIn AI.
| Category | Weight | LazyApply | LockedIn AI | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Application Honesty | 20% | 32 | 12 | +20 | +4.0 |
| Data & Credential Safety | 20% | 50 | 48 | +2 | +0.4 |
| User Control & Transparency | 15% | 33 | 40 | -7 | -1.1 |
| Employer & ATS Legitimacy | 15% | 25 | 10 | +15 | +2.3 |
| Effectiveness Evidence | 12% | 35 | 10 | +25 | +3.0 |
| Pricing & Cancellation Fairness | 10% | 42 | 33 | +9 | +0.9 |
| Support & Accountability | 8% | 42 | 40 | +2 | +0.2 |
| Total | 100% | 37 (F) | 27 (F) | +10 | +9.7 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | LazyApply | LockedIn AI | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Application Honesty | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data & Credential Safety | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| User Control & Transparency | 15% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Employer & ATS Legitimacy | 15% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Effectiveness Evidence | 12% | 1 | 1 | — | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Pricing & Cancellation Fairness | 10% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Support & Accountability | 8% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 14 | 3 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 26 | 5 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
LazyApply has 17 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 14 with a source URL, 3 documented absences; LockedIn AI has 30 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 26 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for LazyApply and LockedIn AI sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 47 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 17 for LazyApply, across 4 distinct source domains, and 30 for LockedIn AI, across 3 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- js-v1.0
- LazyApply last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- LockedIn AI last reviewed
- September 4, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next