HomeCompareLever vs SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Lever vs SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

Export comparison (CSV)Pro

§ The result

4 points separate SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting and Lever.

Within the ATS-integrated cohort, SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting edges Lever by 4 points under rubric v1.0, 53 to 49. SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting leads 5 of the 7 criteria, including Article 11 Technical Documentation, while Lever leads 2, including Post-Market Monitoring. Article 11 Technical Documentation is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Lever 52, SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 70 — and at a 20% weight it carries 73% of the weighted advantage SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting holds across the 5 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

Lever and SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting are both filed under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 2 secondary categories: Sourcing and Screening.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773.

RecordLeverSAP SuccessFactors Recruiting
Price tierMidEnterprise
HeadquartersUSDE
Founded20121972

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 20% weight · 61% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Lever 52 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 70

    3.6 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

  2. 12% weight · 72% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Lever 45 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 40

    0.6 weighted points to Lever

  3. 15% weight · 79% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Lever 32 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 35

    0.4 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

  4. 18% weight · 85% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Lever 42 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 40

    0.4 weighted points to Lever

  5. 8% weight · 91% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Lever 58 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 62

    0.3 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

  6. 15% weight · 96% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Lever 58 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 60

    0.3 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

  7. 12% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Lever 60 · SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 62

    0.2 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -4.0 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 5.9 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -4 beside that -4.0.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Lever minus SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting.

CategoryWeightLeverSAP SuccessFactors RecruitingΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%5270-18-3.6
Bias Audit Transparency18%4240+2+0.4
FRIA Support15%3235-3-0.4
Data Governance Disclosure15%5860-2-0.3
Human Oversight Design12%6062-2-0.2
Post-Market Monitoring12%4540+5+0.6
Customer Documentation8%5862-4-0.3
Total100%49 (F)53 (F)-4-4.0

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightLeverSAP SuccessFactors Recruiting
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%21Sources on a separate domain41Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%21Sources on a separate domain21Sources on a separate domain
FRIA Support15%11Sources on a separate domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%21Sources on the vendor's own domain20Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%20Sources on the vendor's own domain30Sources on a separate domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%21Sources on the vendor's own domain21Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%21Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%136Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain175Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

Lever has 19 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 13 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting has 22 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 17 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Lever and SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 41 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 19 for Lever, across 2 distinct source domains, and 22 for SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting, across 3 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Lever last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.