HomeCompareOracle Recruiting vs Wellfound

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Oracle Recruiting vs Wellfound

Export comparison (CSV)Pro

§ The result

Wellfound takes the total, Oracle Recruiting takes more of the criteria.

Wellfound (Screening) edges Oracle Recruiting (ATS-integrated) by 3 points under rubric v1.0, 52 to 49. Oracle Recruiting leads more of the criteria than Wellfound — 5 to 2 — but Bias Audit Transparency, which Wellfound leads, carries 18% of the rubric, and the weighted sum still falls to Wellfound. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Oracle Recruiting 30, Wellfound 82 — and at an 18% weight it carries 80% of the weighted advantage Wellfound holds across the 2 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

Oracle Recruiting is filed under ATS-integrated AI, Wellfound under Screening AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Sourcing.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773.

RecordOracle RecruitingWellfound
Price tierEnterpriseMid
HeadquartersUSUS
Founded19772012

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 46% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Oracle Recruiting 30 · Wellfound 82

    9.4 weighted points to Wellfound

  2. 20% weight · 66% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Oracle Recruiting 60 · Wellfound 40

    4.0 weighted points to Oracle Recruiting

  3. 12% weight · 77% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Oracle Recruiting 40 · Wellfound 60

    2.4 weighted points to Wellfound

  4. 15% weight · 89% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Oracle Recruiting 60 · Wellfound 45

    2.3 weighted points to Oracle Recruiting

  5. 15% weight · 94% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Oracle Recruiting 35 · Wellfound 28

    1.1 weighted points to Oracle Recruiting

  6. 12% weight · 98% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Oracle Recruiting 60 · Wellfound 52

    1.0 weighted points to Oracle Recruiting

  7. 8% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Oracle Recruiting 62 · Wellfound 58

    0.3 weighted points to Oracle Recruiting

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -3.2 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 20.3 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -3 beside that -3.2.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Oracle Recruiting minus Wellfound.

CategoryWeightOracle RecruitingWellfoundΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%6040+20+4.0
Bias Audit Transparency18%3082-52-9.4
FRIA Support15%3528+7+1.1
Data Governance Disclosure15%6045+15+2.3
Human Oversight Design12%6052+8+1.0
Post-Market Monitoring12%4060-20-2.4
Customer Documentation8%6258+4+0.3
Total100%49 (F)52 (F)-3-3.2

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightOracle RecruitingWellfound
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%30Sources on the vendor's own domain22Sources on a separate domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%1250Audit reportSources on a separate domain
FRIA Support15%11Sources on the vendor's own domain12
Data Governance Disclosure15%30Sources on the vendor's own domain32Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%10Sources on the vendor's own domain41Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%11Sources on the vendor's own domain31Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Customer Documentation8%30Sources on the vendor's own domain41Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%134Sources on the vendor's own domain229Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

Oracle Recruiting has 16 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 13 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; Wellfound has 27 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 22 with a source URL, 9 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Wellfound sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 43 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 16 for Oracle Recruiting, across 2 distinct source domains, and 27 for Wellfound, across 3 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Oracle Recruiting last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Wellfound last reviewed
August 2, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.