HomeCompareOracle Recruiting vs Zappyhire

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Oracle Recruiting vs Zappyhire

Export comparison (CSV)Pro

§ The result

Oracle Recruiting leads Zappyhire on all 7 criteria.

Oracle Recruiting finishes 15 points clear of Zappyhire under rubric v1.0 — 49 against 34 — across the ATS-integrated and Screening cohorts. Oracle Recruiting leads every one of the 7 criteria, Zappyhire none of them, and the closest of the 7 is Bias Audit Transparency, Oracle Recruiting 30 to Zappyhire 28. Article 11 Technical Documentation is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Oracle Recruiting 60, Zappyhire 30 — and at a 20% weight it carries 41% of the weighted advantage Oracle Recruiting holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

Oracle Recruiting is filed under ATS-integrated AI, Zappyhire under Screening AI. They record no secondary category in common.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773. Only Zappyhire is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.

RecordOracle RecruitingZappyhire
Price tierEnterpriseMid
HeadquartersUSIN
Founded19772018

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 20% weight · 41% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Oracle Recruiting 60 · Zappyhire 30

    6.0 weighted points to Oracle Recruiting

  2. 15% weight · 60% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Oracle Recruiting 60 · Zappyhire 42

    2.7 weighted points to Oracle Recruiting

  3. 15% weight · 70% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Oracle Recruiting 35 · Zappyhire 25

    1.5 weighted points to Oracle Recruiting

  4. 12% weight · 80% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Oracle Recruiting 40 · Zappyhire 28

    1.4 weighted points to Oracle Recruiting

  5. 8% weight · 89% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Oracle Recruiting 62 · Zappyhire 45

    1.4 weighted points to Oracle Recruiting

  6. 12% weight · 98% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Oracle Recruiting 60 · Zappyhire 50

    1.2 weighted points to Oracle Recruiting

  7. 18% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Oracle Recruiting 30 · Zappyhire 28

    0.4 weighted points to Oracle Recruiting

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +14.6 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 14.6 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +15 beside that +14.6.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Oracle Recruiting minus Zappyhire.

CategoryWeightOracle RecruitingZappyhireΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%6030+30+6.0
Bias Audit Transparency18%3028+2+0.4
FRIA Support15%3525+10+1.5
Data Governance Disclosure15%6042+18+2.7
Human Oversight Design12%6050+10+1.2
Post-Market Monitoring12%4028+12+1.4
Customer Documentation8%6245+17+1.4
Total100%49 (F)34 (F)+15+14.6

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightOracle RecruitingZappyhire
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%30Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%1221Audit reportSources on a separate domain
FRIA Support15%11Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%30Sources on the vendor's own domain30Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%10Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%11Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%30Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%134Sources on the vendor's own domain126Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

Oracle Recruiting has 16 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 13 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; Zappyhire has 18 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 12 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Zappyhire sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 34 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 16 for Oracle Recruiting, across 2 distinct source domains, and 18 for Zappyhire, across 2 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Oracle Recruiting last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Zappyhire last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.