§ The result
Recruitee leads Qureos on all 7 criteria.
Recruitee scores 42 and Qureos 33 under rubric v1.0, a 9-point gap across the ATS-integrated and Screening cohorts. Recruitee is ahead of Qureos on all 7 criteria but on none of them by as much as 20 raw points, the closest being FRIA Support at Qureos 25 to Recruitee 27. Even Bias Audit Transparency, the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (Qureos 12, Recruitee 30, 18% weight), is only 36% of the weighted advantage Recruitee builds across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
Qureos
Qureos is a Dubai-based AI recruiting platform whose Iris agents source candidates, score and rank applicants against recruiter-set criteria, and run AI voice and video interviews with personality scoring, alongside an ATS and a job-seeker marketplace focused on MENA and South Asia.
Vendor profile
Recruitee
Collaborative applicant tracking system, part of the Tellent group, with AI-assisted features for job-description generation, screening candidates against team-defined criteria, resurfacing past applicants, and summarizing evaluation feedback.
§ The record
Qureos is filed under Screening AI, Recruitee under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Sourcing.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773. Only Qureos is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Qureos | Recruitee |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | AE | NL |
| Founded | 2021 | 2015 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 36% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Qureos 12 · Recruitee 30
3.2 weighted points to Recruitee
20% weight · 66% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Qureos 28 · Recruitee 42
2.8 weighted points to Recruitee
15% weight · 80% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Qureos 44 · Recruitee 52
1.2 weighted points to Recruitee
12% weight · 86% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Qureos 35 · Recruitee 40
0.6 weighted points to Recruitee
12% weight · 91% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Qureos 54 · Recruitee 58
0.5 weighted points to Recruitee
8% weight · 97% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Qureos 52 · Recruitee 58
0.5 weighted points to Recruitee
15% weight · 100% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Qureos 25 · Recruitee 27
0.3 weighted points to Recruitee
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -9.1 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 9.1 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -9 beside that -9.1.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Qureos minus Recruitee.
| Category | Weight | Qureos | Recruitee | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 28 | 42 | -14 | -2.8 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 12 | 30 | -18 | -3.2 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 27 | -2 | -0.3 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 44 | 52 | -8 | -1.2 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 54 | 58 | -4 | -0.5 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 35 | 40 | -5 | -0.6 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 52 | 58 | -6 | -0.5 |
| Total | 100% | 33 (F) | 42 (F) | -9 | -9.1 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Qureos | Recruitee | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 28 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 14 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Qureos has 35 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 28 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Recruitee has 21 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 14 with a source URL, 7 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 56 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 35 for Qureos, across 1 distinct source domain, and 21 for Recruitee, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Qureos last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Recruitee last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next