§ The result
SEEK leads Qureos on all 7 criteria.
The Screening cohort pairing of SEEK and Qureos comes out 54 to 33 under rubric v1.0, a 21-point lead for SEEK. SEEK leads every one of the 7 criteria, Qureos none of them, and the closest of the 7 is FRIA Support, Qureos 25 to SEEK 32. One criterion, Article 11 Technical Documentation, is both the widest raw gap (Qureos 28, SEEK 70) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 20% weight it makes up 41% of the weighted advantage SEEK holds across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
Qureos
Qureos is a Dubai-based AI recruiting platform whose Iris agents source candidates, score and rank applicants against recruiter-set criteria, and run AI voice and video interviews with personality scoring, alongside an ATS and a job-seeker marketplace focused on MENA and South Asia.
Vendor profile
SEEK
SEEK runs employment marketplaces in Australia, New Zealand and Southeast Asia (SEEK, Jobstreet and Jobsdb), and its seekAi employer tools label and rank applicants as 'high-fit' using a model trained on millions of past hirer shortlisting decisions, target job ads at predicted high-fit candidates, and run AI voice or text pre-screens, recommended shortlists and reference checks through a feature called Assist.
§ The record
Qureos and SEEK are both filed under Screening AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Sourcing.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773. Only Qureos is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Qureos | SEEK |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | AE | AU |
| Founded | 2021 | 1997 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 41% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Qureos 28 · SEEK 70
8.4 weighted points to SEEK
18% weight · 65% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Qureos 12 · SEEK 40
5.0 weighted points to SEEK
15% weight · 77% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Qureos 44 · SEEK 60
2.4 weighted points to SEEK
12% weight · 86% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Qureos 35 · SEEK 50
1.8 weighted points to SEEK
15% weight · 91% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Qureos 25 · SEEK 32
1.1 weighted points to SEEK
12% weight · 95% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Qureos 54 · SEEK 62
1.0 weighted points to SEEK
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Qureos 52 · SEEK 64
1.0 weighted points to SEEK
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -20.6 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 20.6 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -21 beside that -20.6.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Qureos minus SEEK.
| Category | Weight | Qureos | SEEK | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 28 | 70 | -42 | -8.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 12 | 40 | -28 | -5.0 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 32 | -7 | -1.1 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 44 | 60 | -16 | -2.4 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 54 | 62 | -8 | -1.0 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 35 | 50 | -15 | -1.8 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 52 | 64 | -12 | -1.0 |
| Total | 100% | 33 (F) | 54 (F) | -21 | -20.6 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Qureos | SEEK | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 28 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 23 | 7 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Qureos has 35 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 28 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; SEEK has 30 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 23 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for SEEK sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 65 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 35 for Qureos, across 1 distinct source domain, and 30 for SEEK, across 3 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Qureos last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- SEEK last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next
Scored against