§ The result
Tezi leads Qureos by 25 points.
Under rubric v1.0, Tezi scores 58 to 33 for Qureos, a 25-point gap between two Screening entries. Qureos takes 1 of the 7 criteria, Customer Documentation among them, against 6 for Tezi, whose share includes Bias Audit Transparency. One criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, is both the widest raw gap (Qureos 12, Tezi 83) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 18% weight it makes up 51% of the weighted advantage Tezi holds across the 6 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
Qureos
Qureos is a Dubai-based AI recruiting platform whose Iris agents source candidates, score and rank applicants against recruiter-set criteria, and run AI voice and video interviews with personality scoring, alongside an ATS and a job-seeker marketplace focused on MENA and South Asia.
Vendor profile
Tezi
Tezi's product "Max" is an autonomous AI recruiting agent that sources passive candidates, screens and ranks inbound applications via conversational chat, and schedules interviews, integrating with ATS and calendar tools.
§ The record
Qureos and Tezi are both filed under Screening AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Sourcing.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773. Only Qureos is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Qureos | Tezi |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | AE | US |
| Founded | 2021 | 2024 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 51% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Qureos 12 · Tezi 83
12.8 weighted points to Tezi
20% weight · 70% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Qureos 28 · Tezi 52
4.8 weighted points to Tezi
12% weight · 81% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Qureos 35 · Tezi 58
2.8 weighted points to Tezi
15% weight · 89% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Qureos 25 · Tezi 38
1.9 weighted points to Tezi
15% weight · 95% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Qureos 44 · Tezi 55
1.6 weighted points to Tezi
12% weight · 99% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Qureos 54 · Tezi 63
1.1 weighted points to Tezi
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Qureos 52 · Tezi 50
0.2 weighted points to Qureos
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -24.9 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 25.2 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -25 beside that -24.9.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Qureos minus Tezi.
| Category | Weight | Qureos | Tezi | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 28 | 52 | -24 | -4.8 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 12 | 83 | -71 | -12.8 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 38 | -13 | -1.9 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 44 | 55 | -11 | -1.6 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 54 | 63 | -9 | -1.1 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 35 | 58 | -23 | -2.8 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 52 | 50 | +2 | +0.2 |
| Total | 100% | 33 (F) | 58 (F) | -25 | -24.9 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Qureos | Tezi | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | — |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 28 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 11 | 3 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Qureos has 35 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 28 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Tezi has 14 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 11 with a source URL, 3 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Tezi sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 49 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 35 for Qureos, across 1 distinct source domain, and 14 for Tezi, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Qureos last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Tezi last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next
Scored against